
Originally Posted by
performance jet
you know, i am not going to get into a bs argument over impeller sizing vs rpm curves, its already been done. I am just trying to help this guy and give him some ideas. Tigertooth has his views based on his experience and is obviously a sharp guy. I really respect that. I have my view point, as well, based on 30 plus years of building jets for all kinds of people. In doing so, it has always been a common practice to size impellers to specific engine combinations and rpm needs, this is nothing new. As far as vmax goes, something does not sound quite right with the rpm of 5800 with all he has into the motor, imo. Was this motor dynoed? It would be nice to have real numbers to work with here., at any rate , with the cam that he is using, i feel that the motor may not be seeing its maximum potential, just my opinion. I believe that the power band of that cam may reach up as far as 7000 rpm , correct me if i am wrong, just guessing here. If so i believe that cutting the aggressor a down to a b would net a load more of rpm, if the motor is making its power. I built a level iii jet for a customer running a dynoed 496, inderall injected chevy in a 19 daytona ( 640hp ) with a b cut aggressor mag bronze and he turned 107mph @ 6400 rpm. The bottom line is that we can argue facts and examples all day long and it does not provide any answers, everybody has thier own legitimate story to tell. If vmax really wants to find the answer, he has to do some testing, every boat is different. Maybe he should install a b cut aggressor and find out how that would change his numbers. I would not be suprised if he increased his r's 400 or even more. Assuming, of course, that his motor is continuing to build power in that rpm range and doesn't fall on its face. I would bet a dinner on it.. But , i have been wrong before. I can live with that, no problem. Just my humble opinion...jim
Digg This Thread