california over transom header law????????
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 14 of 34

Thread:
california over transom header law????????

  1. #1
    Senior Member matt1840's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sacramento Ca.
    Posts
    974

    Default california over transom header law????????

    ok no sooner then i launch at discovery park today i got pulled over and cited for over transom headers...

    they didnt do a decibal check, nor did he consider water injection and muffling device...


    what is the ACTUAL law as written in their books? i cant find any info.

    im pretty sure to be illegal they have to be over a certain decibal at idle, or not have any sound deadening system.. ( baffles or water injection)

    any answers would be great.

    oh and by the way if your anywhere near discovery park dont use your diverter you will get a ticket they are now "illegal"

    im pretty sure you could fight it in court since it is the device we use to get our boats on plane...
    Last edited by matt1840; 06-06-2010 at 06:11 PM.
    Matt 74 tahiti 468 olds 72 mph.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v31/matt1840/sig.jpg

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member lowgear351's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    newcastle ca
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Are you running baffles or just wet headers . how did you find out about the rooster tail law. ps did you replace your floor yet .

  4. #3
    Senior Member matt1840's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sacramento Ca.
    Posts
    974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lowgear351 View Post
    Are you running baffles or just wet headers . how did you find out about the rooster tail law. ps did you replace your floor yet .
    im runnin water injection through the headers which makes a HUGE difference.

    another jet pulled up next to us on shore while i was being cited and the officer told me he had just issued a ticket for the use of the diverter the other jetboat.

    he warned me about the use of it and said its unsafe for other boaters "what if they made a turn into the jetstream?"

    well i guess thats their fault for not paying attention lol. guarantee they wont do it again.


    the officer had no sense of humor.


    no i have not replaced my floor but i am now very soon my accelerator pedal ripped out of the floor today.
    Matt 74 tahiti 468 olds 72 mph.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v31/matt1840/sig.jpg

  5. #4
    Senior Member lowgear351's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    newcastle ca
    Posts
    212

    Default

    my headers are watter injected after about 2000 rpm's its loud until then . i guess i will not be going around discovery park area this summer .
    you going to make it out to cfw fathers day weak end . I did not see you out there last weekend there was some nice boats out there and the weather was nice too .

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    concord, ca
    Posts
    837

    Default over transom

    Interesting to see what code they used for your citation. Never heard of it before. Would like to hear more, or at least get a ruling for you. Hopefully in your favor, then you can share the info with us.

    Jerry

  7. #6
    IDGAF acatitude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sacramento,
    Posts
    2,732

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fountain of Youth View Post
    I'd fight the ticket it seems that the cops on the river have no idea what the boating laws are. I had a friend pulled over for having no CF numbers but it was a documented vessel... They had no idea what that was. I was pulled over once while wearing our Lifelines and the cop actually asked to see our lifevests...when I said we're wearing them he felt like an idiot.
    I thought you said that was a chick cop who asked you that??



    26HOWARD CAT

  8. #7
    Senior Member EVILFORCE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4,804

    Default

    Run one of my boats down here to the Lake by the house and 2 sheriffs watching the ramp. So I put in and went nice and slow till I was out of sight. Was not going to piss them off real quick. I had my headers dry and no baffles in. Was just going to make a few passes to check some things out. Came back to ramp 30-40 minutes later and they were still there. Thought O WELL. They never looked at me. So after the Bro inlaw took off with my truck and boat I went and talked to them. Asked them about noise and what keeps them happy. They did not know the laws but said they heard me the whole time I was running. Said as long as no one complained it was not a problem. Still did not answer my question. On your ticket I would fight it. No DB meter and if you were wet and had baffles you were legal.

  9. #8
    058
    058 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fountain of Youth View Post
    I'd fight the ticket it seems that the cops on the river have no idea what the boating laws are. I had a friend pulled over for having no CF numbers but it was a documented vessel... They had no idea what that was. I was pulled over once while wearing our Lifelines and the cop actually asked to see our lifevests...when I said we're wearing them he felt like an idiot.
    Lifelines are not CG certified. You still could have received a ticket for not wearing a certified life vests.
    Within the heart of every stray lies the singular desire to be loved. "Good grief you're an irritating blowhard...." [Tex 6/16/11]

  10. #9
    Senior Member yhammack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Folsom, CA
    Posts
    1,064

    Default

    I like the river and hate it at the same time. haha. We never got bothered in my buddy's old boat if the baffles were in. They didn't give a crap about water, just the baffles. This was years ago though, maybe they are pickier now?

  11. #10
    Senior Member jockorace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hudson, Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,935

    Angry Fight it!!

    Quote Originally Posted by matt1840 View Post
    ok no sooner then i launch at discovery park today i got pulled over and cited for over transom headers...

    they didnt do a decibal check, nor did he consider water injection and muffling device...


    what is the ACTUAL law as written in their books? i cant find any info.
    Several years ago, I had the same confrontation / arguement with a county sheriff here in Minnesota. I had run my blown flat all day on this nice (small) local lake and already had the boat on the trailer ready to go home. He drove in (squad car) and his first words were.."You can't run that thing here". I replied, well too bad you missed it, cuz I've been running here all day.
    Then (to me) it got comical. He proceeded to tell me that my exhaust had to exit thru the transom. I was running water injected headers with insert type collector mufflers. After going back and forth for a while I requested he show me a statute or ordinance, something, documenting the "law" he was citing. When he couldn't produce what I asked for, I proceeded to state (from memory) the sound law limitations (DB) as stated in Minnesota law. When I finished with that I told him to either write me a ticket or stop wasting my time. He puffed up his chest and then said, ......."well, consider this a warning".
    In your case, fight that ticket! Unless he did a correctly performed DB test and ticketed you for excess noise over the allowable limit, he cannot give you a ticket simply for the routing (OT headers) of your exhaust.
    Jocko

  12. #11
    Senior Member dribble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    891

    Default

    So did you get cited for over the transom headers or for no muffling device? I ran a jet on the Sacramento with OT's for ten years with no problems from LE but I never had the baffles out.

  13. #12
    Senior Member Cat Sass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Shingle Springs, CA
    Posts
    456

    Default

    My undersatanding of the law is that you must have some kind of mechanical muffling device, and water is not considered mechanical. I also recall that there is a db level they use, can't remember what it is though. If they cited you for not having a mechanical baffle, then your probably hosed.

    As for the over the transom exhaust being illegal- thats just flat wrong. From my experience, the water cops aren't very well versed in the boating laws.

    The section they cited you for should be printed right on the citation, google it.

    Research the laws and go school them in court, they probably won't show up anyway

  14. #13
    gets 'em wet ultrajet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    folsom, ca
    Posts
    150

    Default

    I dealt with this a couple of years ago. There is no law against OT headers, however, you must have muffler device or "system". Sound restrictions are 88dBA (engines post '93) and 90dBA(engines pre '93). The requirement(s) are spelled out clearly in chapter 5, section 654, 654.05 of the CA boating laws. It does mention exemption from said laws if you have a racing permit or are part of a regatta. Maybe we should get a convoy of jets for a regatta down in Sacto soon!

    http://www.dbw.ca.gov/PDF/LawEnforc/2010CBL.pdf

    by the way I would argue all day long that running water through your headers is indeed a "muffling system". The only problem is that it is not on all of the time which is a requirement. As long as they didn't break out the decibel meter then I don't see how they can stop you. Needless to say I'll probably just avoid the river until the water in Folsom is too low.

  15. #14
    Senior Member dribble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ultrajet View Post
    I dealt with this a couple of years ago. There is no law against OT headers, however, you must have muffler device or "system". Sound restrictions are 88dBA (engines post '93) and 90dBA(engines pre '93). The requirement(s) are spelled out clearly in chapter 5, section 654, 654.05 of the CA boating laws. It does mention exemption from said laws if you have a racing permit or are part of a regatta. Maybe we should get a convoy of jets for a regatta down in Sacto soon!

    http://www.dbw.ca.gov/PDF/LawEnforc/2010CBL.pdf

    by the way I would argue all day long that running water through your headers is indeed a "muffling system". The only problem is that it is not on all of the time which is a requirement. As long as they didn't break out the decibel meter then I don't see how they can stop you. Needless to say I'll probably just avoid the river until the water in Folsom is too low.
    They can make the stop based upon the fact that without baffles the boat is so loud that it must not be in compliance. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that installing a set of baffles in a properly tuned 350-600 hp engine would make not have any real negative effect on performance. The real advantage would be that the cost of the baffles is probably about the same as the cost of the fine.

    I think that running a bunch of un-muffled boats would not do much to garner support from the authorities and the regatta would probably have to be a permitted event.
    Last edited by dribble; 06-07-2010 at 04:00 PM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89