Urine Test
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread:
Urine Test

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Midland, MI
    Posts
    305

    Default Urine Test

    URINE TEST
    (I sure would like to know who wrote this one!


    They deserve a HUGE pat on the back!)


    Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job.


    I work, they pay me.

    I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

    In order to get that paycheck,

    I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem.

    What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who DON'T have to pass a urine test.

    Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them?
    Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.


    I do, however, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their ASS doing drugs while I work.

    Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?
    Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.


    Hope you all will pass it along, though.

    Something has to change in this country -- and soon!

    AMEN!!!
    10.5ft Cat 35hp Merc Myco Trailer

    24 Twister 300hp V8 E-Rude

    http://i35.tinypic.com/epn6ma.jpg

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    mo balls than $cents$ IMPATIENT 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    hugo,okla
    Posts
    10,045

    Default

    i imagine more than 1/2 the peeps that voted for barry wouldn't pass the test

    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #3
    Senior Member LuckyDaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,256

    Default

    I'll pass that test and I have to agree. I think that's a swell idea. But who's going to pay for all of that testing? The people who interpret the results should be paid for their time. If we have people out of a job do it to create jobs, then we would have to pay more taxes to pay them as our state is already broke. Not to mention all of the costs for supplies and such. I think a better idea is to give them a specific time they can draw off of the government tit then they gotta seek money elsewhere. Like Jack in the box, or Carls Jr, or something that will create some sort of income for themselves. This bs about being on welfare while driving a Tahoe on 22's is crap man.

  5. #4
    Senior Member YldBoyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Garbage Grove
    Posts
    1,839

    Default

    That would be very nice.

  6. #5
    adjones419 Wet-n-Wild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Shiloh, IL
    Posts
    1,061

    Default

    I just had to take one this morning!
    Adam
    1996 Ultra XT 21' Jet

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    550

    Default

    Ohh that would be a sh!t storm... It's against our rights yada yada yada. I do belive however in distributing coupons or credit for food items only and the govt. and landlord getting together and handing the rent$$$ directly to the owner and not the welfare receiver. I think people are to destructive to themselves and others when they have cash in hand. Same should go for childsupport/welfare recivers. I have a buddy who had a divorce and gives roughly $450 a month in child support, she is now on welfare and by looking at the kids when they come over I doubt $100 a month goes to the kids and the rest well who knows.

    I think some sort of system of reciepts and accountability (sp?) need to be placed. I think my buddy should be able to bring over $300 in food and $150 in toys, clothes, school supplies etc. and show the court that the $$$ was spent correctly instead of handing her $450 and letting her decide.
    rant over

  8. #7
    ptz
    ptz is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    so ca
    Posts
    785

    Exclamation

    they should cut off the welfare.

    most people that need it ,can't get it..
    the people getting it, all pool resources and educate each other to exploit the system.

    all leo's , officers of the court, deputy DA's and judges should be subject to random drug testing.
    Last edited by ptz; 01-14-2009 at 11:32 AM.

  9. #8
    Maxwell Smartass Racey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lake Meadski
    Posts
    353

    Default

    I do agree that people on welfare should absolutely have to pass urine tests, if you have money to be wasting on recreational drugs you shouldn't be sucking off the system.

    However i also believe a urine test is no judge of how well you perform your job, some of the hardest working, most successful guys i've ever met i found later to be big time pot heads.... what people do in their off time is their choice as far as i'm concerned, when it starts affecting their performance at the job then we have a problem, the problem is their performance and nothing else regardless of the urine test. On the other hand know quite a few completely sober people (they don't even drink) they are total losers, have no skills, and no ambition. Like i say, drug use is no clear indicator of performance, everyone is different.
    Racey - Custom Fabrication Expert

  10. #9
    I'm baaaaack... hkunz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bakersfield, Havasu
    Posts
    4,345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IMPATIENT 1 View Post
    i imagine more than 1/2 the peeps that voted for barry wouldn't pass the test
    That would be a prerequisite
    It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument. -William G. McAdoo, lawyer and politician (1863-1941)

    07 Advantage X-Flight 600 SCi Bravo 1 XR
    04 Cheetah Scorpion 6.2 Bravo 1 - SOLD!
    96 Donzi 21' 454 Bravo 3 Medallion - gone!
    72 Tahiti 16' 468 Olds Berkeley jet - SOLD!
    11 RZR XP, 08 Polaris Scrambler, 06 Rhino, 06 Joyner 650 dune buggy, 04 KFX 700

  11. #10
    "On the road again..." Old Texan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    9,282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IMPATIENT 1 View Post
    i imagine more than 1/2 the peeps that voted for barry wouldn't pass the test
    Good chance Barry himself wouldn't pass.

    One problem with cutting off welfare is the rise in crime when they start stealing the checks from others. Most of these folks aren't gonna work no matter what. But drug testing would be justified and in reality probably a good thing. There should be some limiting factor in paying welfare and an analysis of why people and their subsequent offspring remain on welfare. So many problems and so much expense trying to find an ideal situation/solution to an evergrowing problem.

    I favor sterilizaton of the majority of these "misfits" abusing the system but the Leftist "sympathy nuts" would fight that one tooth and nail. ACLU would be all over it. But again I feel complete sterilization of many third world countries to be in order to end famine and starvation. Maybe I'm being cold and unfeeling in many minds, but reproduction in the 3rd world and the lower welfare class here in the US is way out of hand and just compounding the problem with new generations of impoverished ignorance.

    Just a thought........
    "Bottle by bottle, I'm clearing off that shelf...."

  12. #11
    mo balls than $cents$ IMPATIENT 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    hugo,okla
    Posts
    10,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Old Texan View Post
    Good chance Barry himself wouldn't pass.

    One problem with cutting off welfare is the rise in crime when they start stealing the checks from others. Most of these folks aren't gonna work no matter what. But drug testing would be justified and in reality probably a good thing. There should be some limiting factor in paying welfare and an analysis of why people and their subsequent offspring remain on welfare. So many problems and so much expense trying to find an ideal situation/solution to an evergrowing problem.

    I favor sterilizaton of the majority of these "misfits" abusing the system but the Leftist "sympathy nuts" would fight that one tooth and nail. ACLU would be all over it. But again I feel complete sterilization of many third world countries to be in order to end famine and starvation. Maybe I'm being cold and unfeeling in many minds, but reproduction in the 3rd world and the lower welfare class here in the US is way out of hand and just compounding the problem with new generations of impoverished ignorance.

    Just a thought........
    virus comes to mind doesn't it. unchecked it'll spread till it kills the host but in this case, "checked" gets us more virus

Tags for this Thread

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89