the GN boat with a interesting bottom
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 14 of 25

Thread:
the GN boat with a interesting bottom

  1. #1
    Senior Member tkriley13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,010

    Default the GN boat with a interesting bottom

    14 years ago my dad and I went to irvine for the boat racers reunion i think that is what it was called? Long story short I remember a grey with black strips GN Boat the had a bottom like a golf ball but I think they may have been holes and not dimples.. What would be the purpose of this? I was watching SSers video last night and I think I saw it and remembered that bottom.
    When I was building my boat I was told that I needed to make sure there was no hooks/dips, etc.. Thanks

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member CampbellCarl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Whittier, CA & Katherine Landing
    Posts
    2,501

    Default

    There is a theory that the dimples/holes airate (sp?) the water and makes it less sticky............boats run faster in water with ripples than glassy water..

    CC
    Originally Posted by Rattle Can Lou
    Again, if I came across as a v-drive snob..I apologize,
    Mike

  4. #3
    I do all my own stunts. white tortilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Tempe/Big River
    Posts
    1,295

    Default

    somebody tried it on an SS but it proved no advantage

  5. #4
    Senior Member LiquidDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tkriley13 View Post
    14 years ago my dad and I went to irvine for the boat racers reunion i think that is what it was called? Long story short I remember a grey with black strips GN Boat the had a bottom like a golf ball but I think they may have been holes and not dimples.. What would be the purpose of this? I was watching SSers video last night and I think I saw it and remembered that bottom.
    When I was building my boat I was told that I needed to make sure there was no hooks/dips, etc.. Thanks
    Tom...lets sit down and get a beer some time
    I wanted to do the golf ball dimple thing years ago after researching and finding out submarines got better fuel mileage because their noses and fuselages were dimpled to hold air pockets around them creating less drag...i mentioned this to a few people and their heads went 180
    Dan

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Parker Az. / Burley Id.
    Posts
    633

    Default

    The technology works, most power boat racers are years behind. Multi millinon dollar yachts and sailboat racers have been using riblets for twenty five plus years. All of the America Cup sail boats and Olympic Class boats use it. The good stuff is patened and trade marked by Du Pont. I have not used it or applied it in years, but it was similar to window tint film, as far as application. Twenty years ago it was about $ 7K for enough to do a 12 meter race boat. We removed it after every race, and re applied it before each race. Watched programs on Wild World of Sports reguarding it. ( way befor ESPN was ever born )

    I know the Victory Team in Dubai used it in early 90's and usually kicked everyone's ass in the offshore race boats. I would assume they probably still do.

  7. #6
    Resident Ford Nut Sleeper CP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Diego County
    Posts
    9,376

    Default

    America's cup boats and mega yachts are a different application.

    They've studied dolphins and shark skin their ripples reduce drag.

    Ex 9 time champ jet boat racer Ron Segni with boats that ran 105-115) tried 2 different high dollar coatings on his boat. He went slower with both, he found out the flat black paint with a light sanding worked best:

    Bottom detailing/blueprinting 101:

    When we detailed the bottom of my boat we did the same with flat black paint and sanding.

    The films and special coatings have a lot to do with application and surface area that is in contact with the water...obviously

    S CP
    Last edited by Sleeper CP; 04-12-2012 at 08:48 PM.

    "Dark Sarcasm"
    Going fast is only half the fun ... what you make go
    fast is the other half.
    " A Government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have"

  8. #7
    Resident Ford Nut Sleeper CP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Diego County
    Posts
    9,376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by white tortilla View Post
    somebody tried it on an SS but it proved no advantage
    The last few SS races I've seen the boats were out of the water about 50% of the time and as rough as the water is during a race one would think any advantage would be de minimis at best. And don't they want SS boats to "hook" when they turn? In that case slippery isn't your friend ....... I'd think (might be wrong)


    S CP

    "Dark Sarcasm"
    Going fast is only half the fun ... what you make go
    fast is the other half.
    " A Government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have"

  9. #8
    gn7
    gn7 is offline
    Senior Member gn7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    21,453

    Default

    Comparing the bottom of a surface riding "planing hull" and a full displacement sail boat, or ship, or fully submerged submarine, and even a golf ball that is completely surrounded by undisturbed air, is comparing apples and oranges.
    The chopped surface of the water effectively acts to do basically the same thing as the surface on a golf ball. On dead smooth, "perfect reflection" water, it may very well be of some benefit. If thats your goal. On a drag boat it may be of some benefit. But the less perfect the water is, the less gain you will see. I don't think it much matters if the disturbance is on the surface of the water, or on the bottom of the boat.
    LINK:GN-RACING.COM

    The problem with Obama jokes is that his worshippers don't think they are funny, and the rest of us don't think they are jokes

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ventura County, CA
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gn7 View Post
    The chopped surface of the water effectively acts to do basically the same thing as the surface on a golf ball. On dead smooth, "perfect reflection" water, it may very well be of some benefit. If thats your goal. On a drag boat it may be of some benefit. But the less perfect the water is, the less gain you will see. I don't think it much matters if the disturbance is on the surface of the water, or on the bottom of the boat.
    I'm not so sure about that. The idea of a "disturbed surface" is to break laminar flow through turbulence. Once the hull pierces choppy water, at some depth, ie. lower portions of the hull, the chop will not increase turbulence. I suppose how "disturbed" the surface is will determine how well it will work at various speeds. The offshore guys create their own turbulent flow conditions by ventilating the hull with near perpendicular steps.

    Michael

  11. #10
    gn7
    gn7 is offline
    Senior Member gn7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    21,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael1 View Post
    I'm not so sure about that. The idea of a "disturbed surface" is to break laminar flow through turbulence. Once the hull pierces choppy water, at some depth, ie. lower portions of the hull, the chop will not increase turbulence. I suppose how "disturbed" the surface is will determine how well it will work at various speeds. The offshore guys create their own turbulent flow conditions by ventilating the hull with near perpendicular steps.

    Michael
    There is a huge difference between perpendicular steps and serpintine steps and the like, and golf ball dimples. There is a huge difference between disturbence, and trapping air.

    You could increase the speed of almost any flat bottom by simply attaching the cav plate to the transom 3/4 to 1" up from the bottom. Of course thats not legal some sanctions, and may not be the best handling situation, but it will be faster. I would willing to bet a considerable increase over dimpling the cav plate.
    LINK:GN-RACING.COM

    The problem with Obama jokes is that his worshippers don't think they are funny, and the rest of us don't think they are jokes

  12. #11
    Senior Member Reservoir Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Meridian, Idaho
    Posts
    895

    Default

    so would it be a benefit to ball mill small grooves parallel the transom in blast plate and or the cav plate?

  13. #12
    Senior Member SHAWN DAVIS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    lake Charles, Louisiana
    Posts
    419

    Default

    How about rain X on the bottom??????????
    I heard some small rc boats do it, anyone on a bigger hull?
    Last edited by SHAWN DAVIS; 04-13-2012 at 11:05 AM.

  14. #13
    Senior Member cakeeater ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    huntington beach ca.
    Posts
    336

    Default

    That's Grier's boat (a rush hull), It was at Wilkes when I worked there, very interesting pattern & depth to it, I think it still holds the kilo record.
    Last edited by cakeeater ed; 04-13-2012 at 08:49 AM.

  15. #14
    Senior Member WMorton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    I was watching the threads in regards to speed records on water and had a big "what if." What if in the sponsons one was to put wheels recessed into the sponsons so at high speed the wheels would spin on top of the water. At speed water becomes very hard, would this create less drag, but also provide a much safer form of drag atop the water? Just curious as I know there are some engineers that frequent thses threads.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89