M.P question for perfomance gains
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 14 of 23

Thread:
M.P question for perfomance gains

  1. #1
    Senior Member port austin pirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Granite Bay Ca.
    Posts
    378

    Default M.P question for perfomance gains

    Hey M.P. we all know your kind of a performance GURU, so I was just wondering based upon your vast expertise what kind of MPH gains I can expect in my Fountain after installing two new aluminum cup holders, Now I know if it were a jet would be in the 8-10mph range, but being its a sterndrive v hull, maybe 1-3 mph, let me what you think baised upon you experience. thanks in advance the P,A. PIRATE

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    a.k.a. "Mean Pair" Nice Pair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    I want out of Kalifornia
    Posts
    5,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by port austin pirate View Post
    Hey M.P. we all know your kind of a performance GURU, so I was just wondering based upon your vast expertise what kind of MPH gains I can expect in my Fountain after installing two new aluminum cup holders, Now I know if it were a jet would be in the 8-10mph range, but being its a sterndrive v hull, maybe 1-3 mph, let me what you think baised upon you experience. thanks in advance the P,A. PIRATE
    Welllllllll sonny, I'm gonna need a little more info.

    Are these the builtin kind or the little swingy baskets like the cruiser guys use?

    Approximately what size are they?

    What do they weigh?

    Did you install 2) at the front seats or 4) one each @ all seats?

    Are they polished or powder coated?

    Please hurry with your response, there are other peeps waiting.



  4. #3
    Senior Member port austin pirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Granite Bay Ca.
    Posts
    378

    Default performance enhancers

    Quote Originally Posted by Nice Pair View Post
    Welllllllll sonny, I'm gonna need a little more info.

    Are these the builtin kind or the little swingy baskets like the cruiser guys use?

    Approximately what size are they?

    What do they weigh?

    Did you install 2) at the front seats or 4) one each @ all seats?

    Are they polished or powder coated?

    Please hurry with your response, there are other peeps waiting.
    1. not the swinger cruiser ones
    2. standard size holders. 3. weight would be light, 4. just two replacements rear seats. 4 powder coated. Man these tech questions are tough, Do you think I could have done better installing a supercharger or a jet drive?

  5. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  6. #4
    a.k.a. "Mean Pair" Nice Pair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    I want out of Kalifornia
    Posts
    5,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by port austin pirate View Post
    1. not the swinger cruiser ones
    2. standard size holders. 3. weight would be light, 4. just two replacements rear seats. 4 powder coated. Man these tech questions are tough, Do you think I could have done better installing a supercharger or a jet drive?

    Wait ... wait a minute you have 2) @ the front seats and you're adding 2) @ the rear seats?
    If you expect a quality answer you'll have to supply the correct info. (information)

    Sorry for the slow response, the tech line has been "Hot" lately.

    p.s. I'm thinking the super charger is an option but don't write off the jet drive yet.



  7. #5
    Senior Member port austin pirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Granite Bay Ca.
    Posts
    378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nice Pair View Post
    Wait ... wait a minute you have 2) @ the front seats and you're adding 2) @ the rear seats?
    If you expect a quality answer you'll have to supply the correct info. (information)

    Sorry for the slow response, the tech line has been "Hot" lately.

    p.s. I'm thinking the super charger is an option but don't write off the jet drive yet.
    No front cup holders in the CK , just replaced the rear seat white plastic ones, salesman said I should see significant performance gain, hey while I have you on the line do you have any knowledge of this skater guy their calling the MAYTAG MAN , or the FRIDGE

  8. #6
    a.k.a. "Mean Pair" Nice Pair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    I want out of Kalifornia
    Posts
    5,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by port austin pirate View Post
    No front cup holders in the CK , just replaced the rear seat white plastic ones, salesman said I should see significant performance gain, hey while I have you on the line do you have any knowledge of this skater guy their calling the MAYTAG MAN , or the FRIDGE
    no cup holders in front replaced the rear cup holders with aluminumium ......... hmmmmmm! ........ sounds like you may have upset the c/g, you may have to move your batteries to the front to offset the added weight of the cup holders.
    When was the last time you changed your oil?

    I'll ask around about your friends.



  9. #7
    Senior Member port austin pirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Granite Bay Ca.
    Posts
    378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nice Pair View Post
    no cup holders in front replaced the rear cup holders with aluminumium ......... hmmmmmm! ........ sounds like you may have upset the c/g, you may have to move your batteries to the front to offset the added weight of the cup holders.
    When was the last time you changed your oil?

    I'll ask around about your friends.
    Oil what oil I thought only whackers needed oil

  10. #8
    Or Seth, either one Budweiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tower Park Resort, Lodi, CA
    Posts
    3,270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by port austin pirate View Post
    Oil what oil I thought only whackers needed oil
    TMI

  11. #9
    a.k.a. "Mean Pair" Nice Pair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    I want out of Kalifornia
    Posts
    5,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Budweiser View Post
    TMI
    Hey Bud, you're a technical kinda guy, help me "splain" this shit to this kinda slow car-boat owner.



  12. #10
    Or Seth, either one Budweiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tower Park Resort, Lodi, CA
    Posts
    3,270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nice Pair View Post
    Hey Bud, you're a technical kinda guy, help me "splain" this shit to this kinda slow car-boat owner.
    Once you understand the fundamentals, it's really quite simple. For a number of years now, work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of an aluminum cup holder that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grammeters. Such an instrument is the Turbo Drink Holdabulator.

    Now, basically, the only new principle involved is that instead of power being generated by the relative motion of conductors and fluxes, it is produced by the modial interaction of magneto-reluctance and capacitive diractance.

    The original version had a base plate of pre-famulated amulite surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented.

    The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots of the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a non-reversible tremie pipe to the differential girdle spring on the "up" end of the grammeters.

    The Turbo Drink Holdabulator has now reached a high level of development, and it’s being successfully used in the operation of novertrunnions. Moreover, whenever a forescent skor motion is required, it may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration.

  13. #11
    Senior Member port austin pirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Granite Bay Ca.
    Posts
    378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Budweiser View Post
    Once you understand the fundamentals, it's really quite simple. For a number of years now, work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of an aluminum cup holder that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grammeters. Such an instrument is the Turbo Drink Holdabulator.

    Now, basically, the only new principle involved is that instead of power being generated by the relative motion of conductors and fluxes, it is produced by the modial interaction of magneto-reluctance and capacitive diractance.

    The original version had a base plate of pre-famulated amulite surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented.

    The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots of the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a non-reversible tremie pipe to the differential girdle spring on the "up" end of the grammeters.

    The Turbo Drink Holdabulator has now reached a high level of development, and it’s being successfully used in the operation of novertrunnions. Moreover, whenever a forescent skor motion is required, it may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration.
    finally a simple explanation that anyone can understand, Thanks B.W.

  14. #12
    a.k.a. "Mean Pair" Nice Pair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    I want out of Kalifornia
    Posts
    5,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by port austin pirate View Post
    finally a simple explanation that anyone can understand, Thanks B.W.
    See what happens when you put the right people on the job.


    Next question please.



  15. #13
    a.k.a. "Mean Pair" Nice Pair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    I want out of Kalifornia
    Posts
    5,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Budweiser View Post
    Once you understand the fundamentals, it's really quite simple. For a number of years now, work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of an aluminum cup holder that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grammeters. Such an instrument is the Turbo Drink Holdabulator.

    Now, basically, the only new principle involved is that instead of power being generated by the relative motion of conductors and fluxes, it is produced by the modial interaction of magneto-reluctance and capacitive diractance.

    The original version had a base plate of pre-famulated amulite surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented.

    The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots of the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a non-reversible tremie pipe to the differential girdle spring on the "up" end of the grammeters.

    The Turbo Drink Holdabulator has now reached a high level of development, and it’s being successfully used in the operation of novertrunnions. Moreover, whenever a forescent skor motion is required, it may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration.
    Sooooooooooo, you don't think he screwed up the c/g



  16. #14
    Or Seth, either one Budweiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tower Park Resort, Lodi, CA
    Posts
    3,270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nice Pair View Post
    Sooooooooooo, you don't think he screwed up the c/g
    While a quantum theory of gravity may be needed in order to reconcile general relativity with the principles of quantum mechanics, difficulties arise when one attempts to apply the usual prescriptions of quantum field theory to the force of gravity via graviton bosons. The problem is that the theory one gets in this way is not renormalizable and therefore cannot be used to make meaningful physical predictions. As a result, theorists have taken up more radical approaches to the problem of quantum gravity, the most popular approaches being string theory and loop quantum gravity.

    Strictly speaking, the aim of quantum gravity is only to describe the quantum behavior of the gravitational field and should not be confused with the objective of unifying all fundamental interactions into a single mathematical framework. While any substantial improvement into the present understanding of gravity would aid further work towards unification, study of quantum gravity is a field in its own right with various branches having different approaches to unification. Although some quantum gravity theories, such as string theory, try to unify gravity with the other fundamental forces, others, such as loop quantum gravity, make no such attempt; instead, they make an effort to quantize the gravitational field while it is kept separate from the other forces. A theory of quantum gravity that is also a grand unification of all known interactions is sometimes referred to as The Theory of Everything (TOE).

    One of the difficulties of quantum gravity is that quantum gravitational effects are only expected to become apparent near the Planck scale, a scale far smaller in distance (equivalently, far larger in energy) than those currently accessible at high energy particle accelerators. As a result, quantum gravity is a mainly theoretical enterprise, although there are speculations about how quantum gravitational effects might be observed in existing experiments.

    And you know what that means.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Tags for this Thread

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95