Help me with the "science" of a car intake vs boat intake. GN7, I'm looking at you.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 14 of 58

Thread:
Help me with the "science" of a car intake vs boat intake. GN7, I'm looking at you.

  1. #1
    Head Janitor FormulaZR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    690

    Default Help me with the "science" of a car intake vs boat intake. GN7, I'm looking at you.

    Here's what I'm needing help with. Does a jet boat "load" the engine enough differently than a car to "shift" the powerband of the intake it needs?

    Not sure if that made sense...so I'll try to ask another way. Say the engine in my jet boat only runs 6000 rpm, then do I get an intake for a car that is perfect for the 6000 rpm range, or does it shift up?

    I ask...because I have a 383 LS1 in my boat. With a Performer RPM and carb, it revved 5700-5800 rpm, a Super Vic and carb, it revved 6000-6100 rpm. Now, with a Fast 90 intake (that is usually great in the 5500-6000 rpm range) it'll only rev to 5500 rpm. - it'll "flash" to the 6200 rpm rev limit, but then get pulled down to 5500 rpm. I'm 99% sure the issue isn't the tune, so I'm wondering if the intake it just a bit undersized?

    The intake that I *think* would be good has an optimum rpm range of 7000-8000 rpm - and I know my engine will never be able to spin over 6000 rpm. But...I'm wondering if that might actually be perfect?
    Last edited by FormulaZR; 11-15-2013 at 10:21 PM.


    "No, my boat doesn't need any more power" - No one ever

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    northern member Canuc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nechako
    Posts
    602

    Default

    what carb ? try a super sucker on the victor
    Quote Originally Posted by gn7 If your ran a cammer your odds of finishing WERE ZERO.

  4. #3
    mo balls than $cents$ IMPATIENT 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    hugo,okla
    Posts
    11,733

    Default

    Canuc he is efi. i do agree on the intake.do that super victor with a elbow for your tb.may have to change rails tho

    Dare to be different, if it turns out great you can claim you planned it that way.

    Jetboatperformance.com

  5. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  6. #4
    northern member Canuc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nechako
    Posts
    602

    Default

    fockin efi put a carb back on .
    Quote Originally Posted by gn7 If your ran a cammer your odds of finishing WERE ZERO.

  7. #5
    northern member Canuc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nechako
    Posts
    602

    Default

    don't know efi , but think the fact that the carb on the victor pulled 5-600 more rpm says you want the higher rpm efi manifold . that or the tb is just too small ??? where's Beer 30
    Quote Originally Posted by gn7 If your ran a cammer your odds of finishing WERE ZERO.

  8. #6
    gn7
    gn7 is offline
    Senior Member gn7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    25,975

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FormulaZR View Post
    Here's what I'm needing help with. Does a jet boat "load" the engine enough differently than a car to "shift" the powerband of the intake it needs?

    Not sure if that made sense...so I'll try to ask another way. Say the engine in my jet boat only runs 6000 rpm, then do I get an intake for a car that is perfect for the 6000 rpm range, or does it shift up?

    I ask...because I have a 383 LS1 in my boat. With a Performer RPM and carb, it revved 5700-5800 rpm, a Super Vic and carb, it revved 6000-6100 rpm. Now, with a Fast 90 intake (that is usually great in the 5500-6000 rpm range) it'll only rev to 5500 rpm. - it'll "flash" to the 6200 rpm rev limit, but then get pulled down to 5500 rpm. I'm 99% sure the issue isn't the tune, so I'm wondering if the intake it just a bit undersized?

    The intake that I *think* would be good has an optimum rpm range of 7000-8000 rpm - and I know my engine will never be able to spin over 6000 rpm. But...I'm wondering if that might actually be perfect?
    Here's my 2 cents. Steelcomp may have more to say because flow is his thing, and he understands jets better than I do. I know the basics of a jets power band.

    A car can utilize a over rpm, in the manifold and cam. It has gears, and a "over" rpm can land it back in the power band on a shift. High stall converters can tolerate manifolds and cams that would suck in the same engine with a tight converter and tall gears.

    A jet can tolerate a manifold aimed at higher rpm power than say a heavy I/O. It literally blows thru the low end drag. Where a single plane manifold in a I/O may be a pain in the ass, and hurt planning, the jet blows thru that point almost on the hit. It CAN BE like a dyno that doesn't start loading the engine until X RPM is reached. But once it does load it, its pretty much fully loaded. Its the reason the Fast 90 gets pulled back to 5500 after an over rev.
    the max load that engine can tolerate is 5500 with that impeller cut.
    So a car engine that may have a manifold that is suppose to give up at 6000, may actually rev to 6500 because the gearing and load in less than high gear. A car engine that may only turn 6000 in high gear flat out on Bonneville salt, can easily turn 6500 is second. The "over rev past the manifold/cam peak can allow it to fall back to inside the meat of the curve on the shift.
    The jet is in high gear the second the pump sees full load. You are already in high gear. Its kind of like taking a Powerglide and running it in high gear only, but with a loose converter that allows the engine to rev into its power band and pulling the converter the length of the track. The RPM will be what ever the power verses the converter and gearing, and will pretty much pull the same RPM start to finish with maybe another 500 on top end.

    So, in short, where a big heavy I/O might love a dual plane and 850, the jet might run better with the same engine, and a single plane with a 950.
    The boat itself plays a huge part too. Heavy verses light, no different than a car.

    Heres the biggest issue I see with the manifold you mention. The LS is not the number one engine on the planet for carb manifold selection. The BBC is probably number one. If not, it is a very close second to the SBC. Huge selection. Carb manifolds for the LS tend to be geared towards serious HP, or they are street manifolds.

    Its a tough one to call. Up side is, the single plane for the LS1 is probably RPM rated at 350 ci, not 383. Like reading a cam catalog and seeing a cam that is 3500 to 7000, and you stick it in a 572 and it lays down at 5500.
    If the manifold was 6000 to 7000, I would say I see no problem. But a manifold rated for 8000, on a LS1 makes me wonder about its cross section and plenum area. It could be a loser on a 6000 rpm jet. But then, they seem to love tunnel rams even more so than a v drive.

    You say the Fast 90 falls off early. Ever consider the throttle body size? Specially with a 383.
    You say the Super Victor turned the Rs you are looking for. Are you now trying to match that with a EFI and found the Fast 90 didn't hit the number?
    I would still question the throttle body size, however, I am pretty sure when you hit the wall with a tuned port manifold, its pretty much finished. Again, unless you are choking it with a too small of a throttle body.
    Curious, what does a 8000 RPM EFI manifold look like if it doesn't look like a single plane (Super Victor)carb manifold with a throttle body???
    I dunno, I think I will throw this ball in Mr Steels court and see what he has to say. First thing he is going to ask, WHAT IS THIS MANIFOLD?

    I just remembered why I love blowers. This N/A stuff can be tricky.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
    Last edited by gn7; 11-16-2013 at 01:42 AM.

  9. #7
    Head Janitor FormulaZR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    690

    Default

    I have more to say...but for the time being here's what I'm looking at.

    GN7, this is the manifold I'm looking at this hardest:

    Holley Hi-Ram:



    Holley Performance Products EFI Hi–Ram Intake with 1 x102mm GM LS Throttle Body – Longitudinal Mount Plenum Top – For LS1/LS2/LS6 Cathedral Port*300-123


    Followed by:

    Edelbrock Super Victor EFI



    or

    Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT



    Both Edelbrock's have info here: Edelbrock.com - Electronic Fuel Injection - Manifolds - Chevy LS


    "No, my boat doesn't need any more power" - No one ever

  10. #8
    gn7
    gn7 is offline
    Senior Member gn7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    25,975

    Default

    That's about what I expected, as opposed to the long runner Fast 90.
    The Edelbrock Proflo is not unlike a T ram with a larger plenum and relatively short tapered runners, the Victors are basically the same as the carb manifolds.
    The Pro 'Flo probably has a wider power band than the Victors. It would probably have better manners and overall drivability over the victors in a car. . Would it be better in a jet. You got me. My gut tells me no. In a heavy I/O, probably. Jet seems like it would drive right passed any low RPM benefits it might have over the Victors.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
    Last edited by gn7; 11-16-2013 at 02:08 AM.

  11. #9
    Head Janitor FormulaZR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    690

    Default

    I really have more to say about what you posted earlier than I will right now. Just not in the condition right now...but...

    The Pro-Flo XT has had good reports of being good across all powerbands, but it seems like in general - jet boat manifolds don't follow suite with everything else.

    One of my big debates is the Super Vic vs Hi-Ram. So the story goes...above 7k rpm the Hi-Ram is better than the Super Vic. But...I only turn 6k rpm - but in a way, it seems like jet boat engines "like" manifolds that would be considered outside their rpm range?


    "No, my boat doesn't need any more power" - No one ever

  12. #10
    mo balls than $cents$ IMPATIENT 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    hugo,okla
    Posts
    11,733

    Default

    I like the rams out now but like you posted when are you gna need that much intake? Prob can find a nice used super vic efi intake on yellowbullet ls section for sale sticky elbow for your tb cheap there to.

    Dare to be different, if it turns out great you can claim you planned it that way.

    Jetboatperformance.com

  13. #11
    Senior Member Hass828's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    okie, lake Texoma
    Posts
    6,278

    Default

    Not the first time someone has experienced your results. Wont be the last either.
    Check this out, then stick with the carb. Or trade off some power for the placebo of supposedly better manners. Or spend a lot of $ & time trying to equal the carb when you may never quite reach it.
    Pro Systems - Under The Scoop
    "if we keep doing it the same way we always do..we will always get the same results"
    H8-2-W8
    [email protected] first pass

  14. #12
    LP-25.com Infomaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Port Richey, FL
    Posts
    16,861

    Default

    I've bought many carbs from Pat.

    I'm not completely sold on what he has to say in that article. NASCAR went EFI and they wouldn't give up 1/2 of one HP for anythng. Including fuel economy. For the sake of discussion lets say he's right. I don't think the OP had a pro systems carb on it. I don't see an out of the box carb out HP an EFI system. Both being matched well to the engine. Pat's blueprinted state of the art carbs only out performed by 5% by his claim.

    I think his throttle body is too small.
    If For Some Reason I Do Something Worthy Of Recognition. God Provided The Ability And Deserves The Credit.


    QE 439 Twin Turbo

  15. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4

    Default

    NASCAR went EFI because they restrict HP to a certain amount and when restricting HP and trying to win, then yes EFI and MPG will win. FormulaZR is looking at Max HP.

  16. #14
    LP-25.com Infomaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Port Richey, FL
    Posts
    16,861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by diesel_lv View Post
    NASCAR went EFI because they restrict HP to a certain amount and when restricting HP and trying to win, then yes EFI and MPG will win. FormulaZR is looking at Max HP.
    He's looking for an intake manifold. But apparently he needs a Pro Systems carb also.
    If For Some Reason I Do Something Worthy Of Recognition. God Provided The Ability And Deserves The Credit.


    QE 439 Twin Turbo

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Tags for this Thread

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95