Coated or not
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 14 of 33

Thread:
Coated or not

  1. #1
    [email protected]
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,011

    Default Coated or not

    Rod and main bearings. Worth the extra money? Really any better coated?

    Engine BBC, Eagle crank/H beam rods with L19 bolts, forged Wiseco pistons, 12.5 to 1 turning 7400 with an occassional 8000 rpm. Drag race only in a hydro.

    Thanks
    Tim

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tri-Cities, TN
    Posts
    1,681

    Default

    In your case yes, well worth the money.
    Chris Straub
    Straub Technologies

    3HP is an A$$ Whooping!!! JW

  4. #3
    [email protected]
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    Well so far as my first experience with them has saved my crank. They are beat up but the crank looks good. I'm taking it to a different machine shop and hopefully I can find out why. I'm thinking the last one messed the crank up. Don't know how things can measure right and the wear on the bearings show they are all wrong. Going to measure tomorrow and see what I get.

    Tim

  5. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  6. #4
    steelcomp was here
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    n/e TN
    Posts
    26,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cstraub View Post
    In your case yes, well worth the money.
    X2
    Tim, there can be all sorts of different things going on that aren't necessarily clearance related. Also, clearance differences as small just a few tenths cn be significant...if you can't accurately mesure to .000X, try to find someone in your area that can. Check things like crank runout and main bore alignment. Turning that kind of r's requires some good attention to detail.
    Maybe post a pic of your bearings if you can. That's always fun.
    If God is your co-pilot, change seats!
    Acts 2:38, the perfect answer to the perfect question.

  7. #5
    [email protected]
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    I'm going to check the clearances and compare them to the machinsts. When I took this engine apart in spring the bearings all were good but #3 rod. The crank was turned and now everything is wrong. I beleive it's in the crank. The crack has been turned .010. How far would you guys go on turning it if it needs that to fix it? Or would it be better to replace the crack and start over?

    Tim

  8. #6
    gn7
    gn7 is offline
    Senior Member gn7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    25,975

    Default

    WON'T LEAVE HOME WITHOUT THEM! This pic was taken by WANNABE at out last race. Notice there is no oil pressure and the tach is at 6000. Our races are shore start with a dead engine. Fire and go. Do they help? Have no idea! But we haven't failed a bearing in 4 years. As Steel stated, .000X means alot! And it doesn't have to be in the crank or bores. It can be in misaligned main bores. And the tighter you try to run your clearences, the closer the alignment has to be. Sometimes I am amazed at have perfect the mains come out of one motor, and the wear on another. We have one block that must be absolutely dead nuts on, because it has never even left a mark on a bearing.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9thanks7.jpg 
Views:	91 
Size:	273.3 KB 
ID:	63547  

  9. #7
    Senior Member Hass828's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    okie, lake Texoma
    Posts
    6,278

    Default

    Coated!

  10. #8
    steelcomp was here
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    n/e TN
    Posts
    26,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by River Rat 005 View Post
    I'm going to check the clearances and compare them to the machinsts. When I took this engine apart in spring the bearings all were good but #3 rod. The crank was turned and now everything is wrong. I beleive it's in the crank. The crack has been turned .010. How far would you guys go on turning it if it needs that to fix it? Or would it be better to replace the crack and start over?

    Tim
    I always look at the fillet raduis on the crank...a .020/.020 crank can be stronger than a new crank if the fillet radius is better.
    JMO
    If God is your co-pilot, change seats!
    Acts 2:38, the perfect answer to the perfect question.

  11. #9
    Senior Member Morg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reno, So close to hell you can see Sparks.
    Posts
    1,840

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steelcomp View Post
    I always look at the fillet raduis on the crank...a .020/.020 crank can be stronger than a new crank if the fillet radius is better.
    JMO
    On a GM crank how far do you feel you can go under without worrying about the Nitrate depth??

    Can you also elaborate on why the .020/.020 crank would be stronger??
    It is supposed to be hard, if it wasn't hard everyone would do it. The "hard" is what makes it great. - Jimmy Dougan

    It's a celebration bitche's - Rick James

    Akita's & Boats: http://s255.photobucket.com/albums/hh149/K-Morg/

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickjet View Post
    Ok....I'm retarted....so what...
    Quote Originally Posted by Cole Man II View Post
    Tony, Tony, Tony....

    If dragboats were gay, that would make you Harvey Milk...
    Quote Originally Posted by steelcomp View Post
    Well if you want to make up a bunch of numbers to be right, then yes, that works.

  12. #10
    I'm No Expert Shaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    San Clemente, Ca
    Posts
    3,139

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steelcomp View Post
    a .020/.020 crank can be stronger than a new crank if the fillet radius is better.
    JMO
    I assume this is because if the radius is smaller that area is more prone to breaking where as if it has a larger radius it strengthens that transition?

  13. #11
    Senior Member Josh@JBP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morg View Post
    On a GM crank how far do you feel you can go under without worrying about the Nitrate depth??

    Can you also elaborate on why the .020/.020 crank would be stronger??
    I believe he's saying it "could" be stronger, but only if the fillet is increased from standard.

    I couldn't imagine an undersized crank would be weaker to any perceivable degree all by itself. The down side I believe is the added thickness of the bearings required. I may be wrong(if so prove me wrong in less than 42 pages please).

    Question, at what point does the bearing thickness become an issue? A thicker bearing reduce heat transfer, Correct? or something like that? And hows does the coated bearing effect same.

  14. #12
    steelcomp was here
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    n/e TN
    Posts
    26,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morg View Post
    On a GM crank how far do you feel you can go under without worrying about the Nitrate depth??

    Can you also elaborate on why the .020/.020 crank would be stronger??
    .020 pretty much wipes out any factory treatmenet, but tha'ts easily fixed.

    I always look at the fillet raduis on the crank...a .020/.020 crank can be stronger than a new crank if the fillet radius is better.
    JMO
    If God is your co-pilot, change seats!
    Acts 2:38, the perfect answer to the perfect question.

  15. #13
    steelcomp was here
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    n/e TN
    Posts
    26,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaun View Post
    I assume this is because if the radius is smaller that area is more prone to breaking where as if it has a larger radius it strengthens that transition?
    eggzackley. Smaller or poorly machined. I reject more new cranks because of poor fillet radii than for any other reason. If a customer has to grind his crank anyway, and the fillet sucks, I may advise him to go .020 instead of .010 (from standard) so we can clean up the radius. He'll have a stronger crank, and IMO the amount you're removing from the journal is negligible. The crank's weakness isn't in the dia. of the journal, it's in the stress risers that can form in the fillet. Reduce that potential, and the crank is in essence stronger (in that it will have more resistance to breaking) than if you don't.
    Last edited by scott foxwell; 01-06-2010 at 07:03 PM.
    If God is your co-pilot, change seats!
    Acts 2:38, the perfect answer to the perfect question.

  16. #14
    steelcomp was here
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    n/e TN
    Posts
    26,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post
    I believe he's saying it "could" be stronger, but only if the fillet is increased from standard.

    I couldn't imagine an undersized crank would be weaker to any perceivable degree all by itself. The down side I believe is the added thickness of the bearings required. I may be wrong(if so prove me wrong in less than 42 pages please).

    Question, at what point does the bearing thickness become an issue? A thicker bearing reduce heat transfer, Correct? or something like that? And hows does the coated bearing effect same.
    I haven't seen or heard any evidence that at .020 heat transfer is a problem. Theoretically, heat may be reduced some because of reduced surface speed.
    Is it measurable? Who knows.
    If God is your co-pilot, change seats!
    Acts 2:38, the perfect answer to the perfect question.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95