Merlin-X heads
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread:
Merlin-X heads

  1. #1
    Member jonesdrivingajones's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Oroville WA
    Posts
    75

    Default Merlin-X heads

    Anyone out there with any time using Merlin - x heads? Im very curious to know how the big ports and tiny chambers work? I am a fan of smaller chamber size versus spinning a heavier piston. Any info would help.
    Go Fast! Turn Left!

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    gn7
    gn7 is offline
    Senior Member gn7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    25,975

    Default

    I have kicked these around in my head for some time. The only real advantage is the lighter piston, and possibly a better flame front. They don't really flow all that great compared to other shallow valve angle, conventional siamese/common wall port heads.
    When they first came out there were some geometry issues when using stud mounted rockers, which was a "selling point" for them then. They took them off the market, re-designed the rocker area. They require shaft rockers now, and I guess the geometry issues have been resolved.

    I still haven't ruled them out, but that ONE motor would be the bastard in my engine pool. I like being able to move parts around between different engine combos.
    But I would still like to try a set.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

  4. #3
    Member jonesdrivingajones's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Oroville WA
    Posts
    75

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gn7 View Post
    I have kicked these around in my head for some time. The only real advantage is the lighter piston, and possibly a better flame front. They don't really flow all that great compared to other shallow valve angle, conventional siamese/common wall port heads.
    When they first came out there were some geometry issues when using stud mounted rockers, which was a "selling point" for them then. They took them off the market, re-designed the rocker area. They require shaft rockers now, and I guess the geometry issues have been resolved.

    I still haven't ruled them out, but that ONE motor would be the bastard in my engine pool. I like being able to move parts around between different engine combos.
    But I would still like to try a set.



    I agree with keeping parts interchangable. There is also a key interest not only with the port and chamber volumes, but the use of conventional square port intake.
    Go Fast! Turn Left!

  5. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  6. #4
    steelcomp was here
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    n/e TN
    Posts
    26,271

    Default

    The port/valve centerline intersection angle on these will never allow them to flow very well, especially in n oval port configuration. There are so many things fundamentally wrong with these heads and that's why they never really went anywhere.
    If God is your co-pilot, change seats!
    Acts 2:38, the perfect answer to the perfect question.

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Tags for this Thread

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95