GW vs. V-Hull that runs...
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 14 of 49

Thread:
GW vs. V-Hull that runs...

  1. #1
    Senior Member zacho!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    tucson, Arizona
    Posts
    979

    Default GW vs. V-Hull that runs...

    I've heard all kinds of different opinions why GW's are better than well set up v-hulls and so much worse than a well set up tunnel like a Cheyenne or TPR. Ive read pretty much all the bad endings of v-hulls, but my question is with a super efficient rig on a V - VS. same weight/HP/pump on a GW - all things being the same...how much better is the GW and what makes it happen? how much lift does the GW produce vs a v @ 90 mph + simple discussion...

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member cyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,620

    Default

    All things equal (weight, power) I'd put a Rogers Bonneville against a gullwing to win.

  4. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Anza Valley, Lost Lake, CA
    Posts
    861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    All things equal (weight, power) I'd put a Rogers Bonneville against a gullwing to win.
    Why no Rogers Custom Boats holding your statement down?

  5. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  6. #4
    Senior Member zacho!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    tucson, Arizona
    Posts
    979

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    All things equal (weight, power) I'd put a Rogers Bonneville against a gullwing to win.
    very interesting - coming from a very fast boat and builder that probably has been around the block a few times...

  7. #5
    Senior Member River Dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    1,608

    Default

    Mike has a valid point... There have been some really hard running Rogers over the years on these boards and he was involved with a few if I'm not mistaken...

    I think it's very hard to compare apples to apples in this. IMO a gullwing will provide a much more "stable" ride while generating a good amount of lift in a moderate power deal.. Some of the v-bottom hulls have been successfull in running a number but to me they look to chine walk alot more. Once again, just my oppinion and obviosly I'm biased.......

    I don't know where the HP limit is where a tunnel starts to be a better package than a gullwing, but there definately is one.... I think a straight comparison with say 650 HP between the two identical weighted river boats and the GW will out perform the tunnel for a typical 800 ft river race... But then there are the curent PC's and Southwind tunnels that guys on here have been making run extremely well too...... Very hard to say and the argument will go on and on, becasue there is no way to really test the theory without exactly matching weight and power.......

    I still say room, handling, acceleration, etc etc.... A good running GW is hard to beat.....

  8. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    LAS VEGAS,NV/Ft Wayne-in
    Posts
    510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by River Dad View Post
    Mike has a valid point... There have been some really hard running Rogers over the years on these boards and he was involved with a few if I'm not mistaken...

    I think it's very hard to compare apples to apples in this. IMO a gullwing will provide a much more "stable" ride while generating a good amount of lift in a moderate power deal.. Some of the v-bottom hulls have been successfull in running a number but to me they look to chine walk alot more. Once again, just my oppinion and obviosly I'm biased.......

    I don't know where the HP limit is where a tunnel starts to be a better package than a gullwing, but there definately is one.... I think a straight comparison with say 650 HP between the two identical weighted river boats and the GW will out perform the tunnel for a typical 800 ft river race... But then there are the curent PC's and Southwind tunnels that guys on here have been making run extremely well too...... Very hard to say and the argument will go on and on, becasue there is no way to really test the theory without exactly matching weight and power.......

    I still say room, handling, acceleration, etc etc.... A good running GW is hard to beat.....


    X2
    well said jason

  9. #7
    Senior Member OkieDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    319

    Default vee bottoms

    there's a reason the sanctioning organizations didn't allow blowers on vee-bottom jets. after an infamous mishap. the vee in question was a gw. I think it was Dan Pasterini. SDBA. early 80's maybe.

  10. #8
    Senior Member Futs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Orange CA, Big River
    Posts
    4,549

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by River Dad View Post
    Mike has a valid point... There have been some really hard running Rogers over the years on these boards and he was involved with a few if I'm not mistaken...

    I think it's very hard to compare apples to apples in this. IMO a gullwing will provide a much more "stable" ride while generating a good amount of lift in a moderate power deal.. Some of the v-bottom hulls have been successfull in running a number but to me they look to chine walk alot more. Once again, just my oppinion and obviosly I'm biased.......

    I don't know where the HP limit is where a tunnel starts to be a better package than a gullwing, but there definately is one.... I think a straight comparison with say 650 HP between the two identical weighted river boats and the GW will out perform the tunnel for a typical 800 ft river race... But then there are the curent PC's and Southwind tunnels that guys on here have been making run extremely well too...... Very hard to say and the argument will go on and on, becasue there is no way to really test the theory without exactly matching weight and power.......

    I still say room, handling, acceleration, etc etc.... A good running GW is hard to beat.....
    The PC's And Southwinds are mod V's, not true tunnels.

  11. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MANTECA
    Posts
    511

    Default Rogers

    Quote Originally Posted by Turtle View Post
    Why no Rogers Custom Boats holding your statement down?
    I have a 76 rogers, 720lbs bare hull (bare.....nothing!!!!) with 690 h.p. that runs 98.6 on gps, and it ran 10.35e.t. @ 98.8 at ming through the lights with a 300lb. driver (first time going to the races). Not sure how that would hold up to an equal gull wing, but it runs pretty good for an old heavy full interior boat. I know that there are lots of fast gull wings, but it's hard to compare without equal weight and H.P.
    Last edited by bigdog; 12-27-2012 at 10:49 AM.

  12. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclone View Post
    All things equal (weight, power) I'd put a Rogers Bonneville against a gullwing to win.

    I'm not really going to get involved here. It has been done several times. 100% of the time it has NOT been with equal weight and power at least when I've watched or been involved.

    ALL things being equal, a Gullwing set up as a Riverboat vs a Rogers set up as a River Boat, I feel the Gullwing will win in 600'-800' feet EVERYY time.

    Of course, it you apply 1300 hp(or a little more ) to a brick, it will become a VERY quick brick(NOT implying that Rogers Boats are bricks at all!!).

    Just my opinion. Others will have different opinions.

    Hope everyone had a nice Christmas, and hope everyone has a happy and prosperous 2013 now that 'DoomsDay' has come and gone .
    Last edited by Rvr Rcr; 12-27-2012 at 10:55 AM.

  13. #11
    Senior Member River Dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    1,608

    Default

    Good point Tim... But you guys are putting up some damn respectable numbers and would not be an easy target for most "river racer" types...

    Big Dog, 98 with under 700 hp in 700+ pound hull is truckin for sure...

    The question of "which is better?" will never be answered... it would be very interesting to set up two identical weight boats and get them as dialed as possible and then run them with 1 documented engine on the track to see once and for all..... But I don't see that happening anytime soon...

    You just have to factor it all in, interior space, handling, quickness, driveability, etc etc and choose one that fits your needs....

  14. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sacramento area
    Posts
    1,136

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by bigdog View Post
    I have a 76 rogers, 720lbs bare hull (bare.....nothing!!!!) with 690 h.p. that runs 98.6 on gps, and it ran 10.35e.t. @ 98.8 at ming through the lights with a 300lb. driver (first time going to the races). Not sure how that would hold up to an equal gull wing, but it runs pretty good for an old heavy full interior boat. I know that there are lots of fast gull wings, but it's hard to compare without equal weight and H.P.
    Ive seen it run faster than that
    Half the people in the world are below average.

  15. #13
    Driver 78CoLeBBF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Golden Shores,AZ
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    I had a CoLe boat v-bottom and on all motor it handled a few tunnels and gw some same hp some more it was a quick boat not fast for the hp it had oh yeah it was on pump gas and a Ford
    Its a FORD thing chevy's arent quick enough to understand

  16. #14
    "Need For Speed" Gearhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, Texas, United States
    Posts
    1,210

    Default

    Which of these two hull styles do you see more of? Thus may lie your answer........

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in


Tags for this Thread

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95