Reply to Thread

Though I couldn't possibly care less what a treacherous demoncrat wants I find it funny that some of you nobama supporters/apologists think he's got a chance in 2012. Whoever the nominee is they're gonna crush your boy landslide style. Bachmann, Perry, hell even the loon ron paul could beat this clown. Any one of the Republican hopefuls would school him in debates. If he has the stones to even agree to any. And you can take your polls that say otherwise and stick 'em in your crackpipe and fire it up. Your boy is going down.....hard. If he doesn't drop out (or get indicted) first.

Originally Posted by Ms Understood

I was thinking about all of the Senior citizens and how the 9% National sales tax would effect them. I don't have a clear understanding of how it works either and would like to hear more than 999. If its that simple, I could see where it would be a benefit for me however I am not sure that we will get the 99% of the occupy wallstreet types on board. You know, life isn't fair and the rich should pay for others lack of success....sarcasm ofcourse.

More like 100% of those leaches will not be on board!

They will actually have to pay 9%, instead of nothing.

Of course, the business and purchase tax would not even apply to them, as they live off of free shit anyway.

Originally Posted by thatguy

It is certainly obvious who they DON'T want to run against.

Cain.

This article clearly illustrates the fear he instills in them.

Bottom Line - Cain's 9-9-9 tax plan is simple: most will simply pay more

The writer makes absurd claims, like the "poor" being hit with 27% taxes versus zero.
False. The business 9% would not apply.
What is stunning to me is the comments. How freaking stupid does one have to be to swallow the BS that this would benefit "the rich" once again?

Does any of these fools realize how much that 9% purchase tax adds up, for instance?

I am not sold outright on the whole 999 deal, i will need it laid out with real numbers to get on board 100%.
(NOT how it would or would not effect me so much as what it would do for our Countries economics, I'll be fine either way)

But this type of write up just shows that those on the dole are against ANY type of fair play.
The lib idea of fair is just take more from the so called rich (which more and more seems to define anyone with a taxable income) and pass it out among the sheep.

Makes me want to puke reading the comments from these morons.

I was thinking about all of the Senior citizens and how the 9% National sales tax would effect them. I don't have a clear understanding of how it works either and would like to hear more than 999. If its that simple, I could see where it would be a benefit for me however I am not sure that we will get the 99% of the occupy wallstreet types on board. You know, life isn't fair and the rich should pay for others lack of success....sarcasm ofcourse.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

Originally Posted by thatguy

Yes.

I have noticed favorable articles this week on MSN about Romney.
Pretty transparent agenda.

As far as Beating O, fact is O may very well be in jail by then.

The liberial media needs him in be the one so they can bring out the rich white man stuff about him.

Originally Posted by SoldHondaBoughtHondo

Zombie......even you could landslide obama.....just as long as
you kept your mouth shut............and nobody ever found what
you post here

Lest we forget it's Americans voting against sheep. The herd is bolstered by government employment, unions and entitlement class folk, all of whom couldn't possibly care less about America's future, as they are only voting to preserve themselves at all costs.

It is certainly obvious who they DON'T want to run against.

Cain.

This article clearly illustrates the fear he instills in them.

Bottom Line - Cain's 9-9-9 tax plan is simple: most will simply pay more

The writer makes absurd claims, like the "poor" being hit with 27% taxes versus zero.
False. The business 9% would not apply.
What is stunning to me is the comments. How freaking stupid does one have to be to swallow the BS that this would benefit "the rich" once again?

Does any of these fools realize how much that 9% purchase tax adds up, for instance?

I am not sold outright on the whole 999 deal, i will need it laid out with real numbers to get on board 100%.
(NOT how it would or would not effect me so much as what it would do for our Countries economics, I'll be fine either way)

But this type of write up just shows that those on the dole are against ANY type of fair play.
The lib idea of fair is just take more from the so called rich (which more and more seems to define anyone with a taxable income) and pass it out among the sheep.

Makes me want to puke reading the comments from these morons.

Originally Posted by thatguy

Yes.

I have noticed favorable articles this week on MSN about Romney.
Pretty transparent agenda.

As far as Beating O, fact is O may very well be in jail by then.

That's RACIST!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by Icy

It's Romney and evident in the media...

Yes.

I have noticed favorable articles this week on MSN about Romney.
Pretty transparent agenda.

As far as Beating O, fact is O may very well be in jail by then.

It's Romney and evident in the media...

Zombie......even you could landslide obama.....just as long as
you kept your mouth shut............and nobody ever found what
you post here

Originally Posted by ram78d10

Perry would be an easy win for Obama because the moderates wouldn't be inclined to vote for a "less educated W."

And you think they would vote for an overly educated, completely incompetent, inexperienced, spineless jellyfish that has already proved he is a 100% liar with no transparency with an agenda that will destroy America ?

Perry would be an easy win for Obama because the moderates wouldn't be inclined to vote for a "less educated W."

Originally Posted by zombie

Of the current GOP "top Tier" candidates which two do you think Obam's camp would best like to see be the GOP nominee?

My guess is Bachmann or Gingerich.

.

Those two would make it easy, that's for sure. Even I don't think the republicans are dumb enough to make that mistake.

It will likely be a tough battle on both sides.

Bachmann and Bachmann.

Or maybe Ron Paul.