WOW.....Another Puppet - Reply to Topic

Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: WOW.....Another Puppet

Your Message

 

Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces)

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 02-03-2015, 06:58 PM
    Roaddogg 4040
    Total Douche...

    Steve
  • 02-03-2015, 01:50 PM
    Forkin' Crazy
    Quote Originally Posted by The Doctor View Post
    He's right. He did NOT say it one time, because he posted it several times. There is no ambiguity in his statement. He thinks people like you should have been aborted. It's simple and straightforward and it defines his character - or lack thereof.
    Ray is right. We're simply feeding a troll with zero substance and far too much desire to argue.
    I saw that too and started to do the same. He said it but he implied nothing. What a tool!!!
  • 02-03-2015, 10:53 AM
    The Doctor
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsplace View Post
    It's people like you that reminds us why we need to keep abortion legal.
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsplace View Post
    Not one time did I say, "Something to the lines of wishing someone was aborted". Not one time.
    If I did, please show me.
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsplace View Post
    I simply ask for you to point out where I said something, that I didn't say, but you came in and made a big deal about my saying it.
    Not one time did I say, "Something to the lines of wishing someone was aborted". Not one time.
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsplace View Post
    That's the problem, there is no implied intention on my part in what I posted.
    I stand behind, "[B][I]Not one time did I say, "[COLOR=#333333]Something to the lines of wishing someone was aborted",
    He's right. He did NOT say it one time, because he posted it several times. There is no ambiguity in his statement. He thinks people like you should have been aborted. It's simple and straightforward and it defines his character - or lack thereof.
    Ray is right. We're simply feeding a troll with zero substance and far too much desire to argue.
  • 02-02-2015, 05:07 PM
    Jake
    Quote Originally Posted by moneypit View Post
    go away troll....
    Ray
    x-26
  • 02-01-2015, 11:26 AM
    Moneypit

    "I" "me"

    Quote Originally Posted by jimsplace View Post
    This thread began with unsubstantiated and foolish comments about a respected appointee.
    Even you accept that, "She is a very well spoken, articulate, intelligent lady."
    I actually don't have an opinion about what she may or may not do, but it certainly seems as though she is being accepted by both sides.
    That in itself should indicate she's not an extremist, one way or another.

    You're right, this thread wasn't about me, but your "PEEPS" tried to make it that way with name calling and stupid posts not related to the subject.
    Did I tell others to go elsewhere or go F**m themselves? No, I did not.
    Did I take what others said and then change their posted wording and meaning, such as when INTHECURL posted that I said, "Something to the lines of wishing someone was aborted?" No, I did not.

    Your "PEEPS" are correct that I came to this site to stir up Sh*t and that I probably don't fit in with this group (thank God).
    I hope that no one comes to this particular location for serious debate, it appears everyone is supposed to agree and facts are irrelevant and can be change at will.
    Entering this location has been more like walking through the doors to the "FUNNY FARM".

    If you want to put me on your ignore button, tell me where it is, and I'll help you.
    Before you try to lecture me, clean up your own house!
    Go away troll....
    Ray
  • 02-01-2015, 04:27 AM
    Jake
    hey Jim, soooo what do you have in common and with who, asshole???????????
  • 01-31-2015, 01:38 PM
    Gopher711
    Quote Originally Posted by Forkin' Crazy View Post
    Yep, try work in Mexico with out papers. LOL!!! Ever looked into what it takes to become a Mexican citizen? Holy shit!!! Hurdle after hurdle. A lengthy and EXPENSIVE process. I was debating with a libtard about the illegal aliens and the liberals wanting to give them all amnesty. Anyway I brought up how difficult it was to obtain Mexican citizenship compared to US citizenship.... And she said, "What does that have to do with US immigration?" Really? Double standard anyone? The logic of liberal thinking and how it evolves is mind boggling. No doubt they believe what they are told and definitely are not "thinkers of common sense". As far as the me person, ignore it and it'll eventually go away.
    Illegal in Korea and most third world counties....KilledMEXICO..if your not worth a ransom ? ...killed or locked away foreverSo if it's OK for MEXICO to treat a U.S. Citizen this way ? Why can't we do the same ? Seems perfectly fair and legal to me
  • 01-31-2015, 01:22 PM
    Forkin' Crazy
    Quote Originally Posted by Moneypit View Post
    Once again guys you have allowed a libtard troll to take a thread about current events happening in DC and change it into a thread about HIMSELF. Jim, this thread isn't about you, it's about another obama subpuppet, (new word since obama is a Soros puppet, his puppet must be a subpuppet), that has screwed up and actually said how she feels. Her "feeling" is contrary to existing law, a "law of the land" so to speak. Other than some vague wording, there is very little actually in the Constitution when it comes to "illegal invaders". The laws that Holder has refused to enforce were actually written and passed by the Congress. Some President, at some time or another, signed those bills into law, thereby establishing guidelines as to who can, and can't, work in America.. As a quick side note, try to go to any other country illegally and find work. Go to Mexico and BUY property....
    Now, back to the real subject at hand.
    While MS Lynch has some feathers in her cap while working as a US Attorney, we are now hearing from her own mouth about her ideals. I watched/listened to the majority of her conformation hearing, (Jim, did you happen to catch any of it live?) She is a very well spoken, articulate, intelligent lady. She has the typical liberal type answers, using great language and sentence structure, while not really answering the actual question. Double talk, sidestepping, and generally trying to mislead the masses. There were a few Republicans that kept trying to re route her back to the question at hand, but she quite skillfully continued to dodge the question with "talking point" answers, never yes, or no, as requested.. When asked if SHE thought obama's EOs, or EM's, pertaining to the latest immigration changes were Constitutional she never said yes or no, but instead went off on a tirade about how the system is broken. News flash, the system isn't broken, it's just being ignored by the current administration, and as to be expected, by AG wantedtobe Holder... (Now that Holder knows his days were numbered based on the last election, he quit)

    The libtards were a joke. Their questions were only launch pads toward those talking points. Not a single liberal ask her anything about how she would, or wouldn't enforce the laws of the land.

    I'd really like to hear how you feel about the AG appointee. AND, remember, Congress writes the bills that go to the President to be vetoed, or signed into law. Once a law is on the books it is the sworn duty of the AG to enforce the law, all the laws, not just the ones he/she agrees with. And not just the ones the current president agrees with.

    Please Jim, try to stay on point. This thread is NOT about you. If you continue trying to change the Lynch subject matter into your own little pissing matches with every post, I'll be forced to put you on ignore status.
    Ray
    Yep, try work in Mexico with out papers. LOL!!! Ever looked into what it takes to become a Mexican citizen? Holy shit!!! Hurdle after hurdle. A lengthy and EXPENSIVE process. I was debating with a libtard about the illegal aliens and the liberals wanting to give them all amnesty. Anyway I brought up how difficult it was to obtain Mexican citizenship compared to US citizenship.... And she said, "What does that have to do with US immigration?" Really? Double standard anyone? The logic of liberal thinking and how it evolves is mind boggling. No doubt they believe what they are told and definitely are not "thinkers of common sense".

    As far as the me person, ignore it and it'll eventually go away.
  • 01-31-2015, 09:30 AM
    canyon

    jimsplace

    jimsplace
  • 01-31-2015, 08:54 AM
    jimsplace
    Quote Originally Posted by Moneypit View Post
    Once again guys you have allowed a libtard troll to take a thread about current events happening in DC and change it into a thread about HIMSELF. Jim, this thread isn't about you, it's about another obama subpuppet, (new word since obama is a Soros puppet, his puppet must be a subpuppet), that has screwed up and actually said how she feels. Her "feeling" is contrary to existing law, a "law of the land" so to speak. Other than some vague wording, there is very little actually in the Constitution when it comes to "illegal invaders". The laws that Holder has refused to enforce were actually written and passed by the Congress. Some President, at some time or another, signed those bills into law, thereby establishing guidelines as to who can, and can't, work in America.. As a quick side note, try to go to any other country illegally and find work. Go to Mexico and BUY property....
    Now, back to the real subject at hand.
    While MS Lynch has some feathers in her cap while working as a US Attorney, we are now hearing from her own mouth about her ideals. I watched/listened to the majority of her conformation hearing, (Jim, did you happen to catch any of it live?) She is a very well spoken, articulate, intelligent lady. She has the typical liberal type answers, using great language and sentence structure, while not really answering the actual question. Double talk, sidestepping, and generally trying to mislead the masses. There were a few Republicans that kept trying to re route her back to the question at hand, but she quite skillfully continued to dodge the question with "talking point" answers, never yes, or no, as requested.. When asked if SHE thought obama's EOs, or EM's, pertaining to the latest immigration changes were Constitutional she never said yes or no, but instead went off on a tirade about how the system is broken. News flash, the system isn't broken, it's just being ignored by the current administration, and as to be expected, by AG wantedtobe Holder... (Now that Holder knows his days were numbered based on the last election, he quit)

    The libtards were a joke. Their questions were only launch pads toward those talking points. Not a single liberal ask her anything about how she would, or wouldn't enforce the laws of the land.

    I'd really like to hear how you feel about the AG appointee. AND, remember, Congress writes the bills that go to the President to be vetoed, or signed into law. Once a law is on the books it is the sworn duty of the AG to enforce the law, all the laws, not just the ones he/she agrees with. And not just the ones the current president agrees with.

    Please Jim, try to stay on point. This thread is NOT about you. If you continue trying to change the Lynch subject matter into your own little pissing matches with every post, I'll be forced to put you on ignore status.
    Ray
    This thread began with unsubstantiated and foolish comments about a respected appointee.
    Even you accept that, "She is a very well spoken, articulate, intelligent lady."
    I actually don't have an opinion about what she may or may not do, but it certainly seems as though she is being accepted by both sides.
    That in itself should indicate she's not an extremist, one way or another.

    You're right, this thread wasn't about me, but your "PEEPS" tried to make it that way with name calling and stupid posts not related to the subject.
    Did I tell others to go elsewhere or go F**m themselves? No, I did not.
    Did I take what others said and then change their posted wording and meaning, such as when INTHECURL posted that I said, "Something to the lines of wishing someone was aborted?" No, I did not.

    Your "PEEPS" are correct that I came to this site to stir up Sh*t and that I probably don't fit in with this group (thank God).
    I hope that no one comes to this particular location for serious debate, it appears everyone is supposed to agree and facts are irrelevant and can be change at will.
    Entering this location has been more like walking through the doors to the "FUNNY FARM".

    If you want to put me on your ignore button, tell me where it is, and I'll help you.
    Before you try to lecture me, clean up your own house!
  • 01-31-2015, 04:47 AM
    Moneypit

    Liberal "Smoke and mirrors"

    Once again guys you have allowed a libtard troll to take a thread about current events happening in DC and change it into a thread about HIMSELF. Jim, this thread isn't about you, it's about another obama subpuppet, (new word since obama is a Soros puppet, his puppet must be a subpuppet), that has screwed up and actually said how she feels. Her "feeling" is contrary to existing law, a "law of the land" so to speak. Other than some vague wording, there is very little actually in the Constitution when it comes to "illegal invaders". The laws that Holder has refused to enforce were actually written and passed by the Congress. Some President, at some time or another, signed those bills into law, thereby establishing guidelines as to who can, and can't, work in America.. As a quick side note, try to go to any other country illegally and find work. Go to Mexico and BUY property....
    Now, back to the real subject at hand.
    While MS Lynch has some feathers in her cap while working as a US Attorney, we are now hearing from her own mouth about her ideals. I watched/listened to the majority of her conformation hearing, (Jim, did you happen to catch any of it live?) She is a very well spoken, articulate, intelligent lady. She has the typical liberal type answers, using great language and sentence structure, while not really answering the actual question. Double talk, sidestepping, and generally trying to mislead the masses. There were a few Republicans that kept trying to re route her back to the question at hand, but she quite skillfully continued to dodge the question with "talking point" answers, never yes, or no, as requested.. When asked if SHE thought obama's EOs, or EM's, pertaining to the latest immigration changes were Constitutional she never said yes or no, but instead went off on a tirade about how the system is broken. News flash, the system isn't broken, it's just being ignored by the current administration, and as to be expected, by AG wantedtobe Holder... (Now that Holder knows his days were numbered based on the last election, he quit)

    The libtards were a joke. Their questions were only launch pads toward those talking points. Not a single liberal ask her anything about how she would, or wouldn't enforce the laws of the land.

    I'd really like to hear how you feel about the AG appointee. AND, remember, Congress writes the bills that go to the President to be vetoed, or signed into law. Once a law is on the books it is the sworn duty of the AG to enforce the law, all the laws, not just the ones he/she agrees with. And not just the ones the current president agrees with.

    Please Jim, try to stay on point. This thread is NOT about you. If you continue trying to change the Lynch subject matter into your own little pissing matches with every post, I'll be forced to put you on ignore status.
    Ray
  • 01-30-2015, 11:01 PM
    The Doctor
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsplace View Post
    If I were to agree with you, you'll more than likely be labeled a liberal, an A-hole, a SOB and be banned from this site.
    So, what the Hell, I agree.
    Actually it was our opinion of you that had the potential to be upgraded.
    We already know SNiC to be of sound mind and standing on solid ground.
  • 01-30-2015, 08:12 PM
    jimsplace
    Quote Originally Posted by SNiC View Post
    No argument here. People do tend to jump to conclusions, especially when they are passionate about their beliefs...... we are all guilty of that
    If I were to agree with you, you'll more than likely be labeled a liberal, an A-hole, a SOB and be banned from this site.
    So, what the Hell, I agree.
  • 01-30-2015, 08:02 PM
    SNiC
    Quote Originally Posted by jimsplace View Post
    That's the problem, there is no implied intention on my part in what I posted.
    I stand behind, "Not one time did I say, "Something to the lines of wishing someone was aborted", which inthecurl, said I posted.Not one time."
    inthecurl
    was trying to inflame and antagonize me and anyone else that he could by changing what I actually posted to something that wasn't.

    I stated earlier that you hadn't posted, when in fact you did. I even indicated you lied, that was wrong to do and I was wrong about you not posting earlier.
    If I posted that I wished you or someone else was aborted, then by all means point it out.
    I make mistakes or forget, but not about this.
    No argument here. People do tend to jump to conclusions, especially when they are passionate about their beliefs...... we are all guilty of that
This thread has more than 14 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95