Settle For Hillary - Reply to Topic

Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: Settle For Hillary

Your Message

 

Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces)

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 02-12-2016, 10:48 AM
    The Doctor
    The choice for democrats is clear as mud unless they finally admit they have no choice at all:

    Attachment 849417
  • 02-11-2016, 08:48 PM
    jimsplace
    Quote Originally Posted by SNiC View Post
    You and I may be a lot in common in these regards and I seriously doubt that I am smarter than you.

    I used to read Jim's posts as I too am interested with others opposing views. But when he post his off topic irrelevant Liberal BS and you call him out on it by presenting him with undisputed opposing facts, (as I have done many many times over) he goes daffy duck on you, changes the subject, and starts with the childish name calling and personal insults including insults and attacks against my faith. His actions reveal the true content of his character and I simply do not need that needless aggravation in my life. I will not take that from Jim or anyone else for that matter. If Jim chooses not to "believe" that his his business, but there is no reason to attack those of us who do believe. I have posted on this forum for several years and have seen Jim's posts run in cycles, and at times he can discuss sensibly, but those very few times are far between and quickly diminished when he goes nuts and daffy. Therefore, I elect to Ignore Jimsplace and I will continue getting Liberal perspectives from other Liberal forum members and from respectful published sources and the likes of Progressive Radio without having to endure the personal childish insults and repulsive religious attacks from the likes of a proud Troll named Jim who's only intent and interest is to be a perpetual disruptive pest. Why else would he participate in a Performance Boat forum and he does not even own a boat and has never shown any interest thereof. I simply choose to not give him the opportunity to satisfy his disruptive pleasures.

    Now back to topic,
    Due to these latest on Hillary's emails, there is NO WAY she should get a pass on this. David Petraeus revealed to only one other person the classified information in his possession, and now Hillary's staff's fingerprints are all over these classified emails and her I.T. guy has taken the 5th. This is going to get interesting.....

    And BTW, Cruz as Batman's Joker, I think he would make a better Pinquin

    What an interesting post.
    So, lets see how his story holds up.


    To begin, SNIC started with the name calling before I even knew he existed, and has done it on virtually everyone who posts a different viewpoint than his.
    Next he posts, "When he post his off topic irrelevant Liberal, BS you call him out on it by presenting him with undisputed opposing facts." When he refers to Liberal, BS what he's saying is that he doesn't accept that viewpoint. SNIC also seems to feel it's necessary to label every action that he disagrees with as LIBERAL, when in fact, often times it's not even a Liberal or Conservative issue, its personal preference. An example is GUN OWNERSHIP, there are conservatives who own guns and there are Liberals who own guns, neither of which want to give up their gun rights or ownership. SNIC doesn't understand that some individuals actually make choices based on circumstance, it isn't Good Vs. Evil. SNIC is very narrow minded.

    I have not one time attacked SNICS faith, I don't even know what it is, nor do I care.
    What I do attack is the false misrepresentation by SNIC's so called faith. He holds out his Faith as somehow Holier than others.
    More than one time SNIC has professed his CHRISTIAN faith and then flat lied or attempted to discredit me or others using profanity or vulgar words. Perhaps in his world those are acceptable actions, but it's not my understanding of a CHRISTIAN actions.

    What SNIC views as my attack on his faith, is actually general truths that everyone is aware that has studied Religion and its history. Every bit of what I have posted is common knowledge.
    I have not posted a single line on Religious history that isn't easily verifiable.
    SNIC apparently doesn't know it's history, and when someone puts it in writing he reverts to, "IT'S HERESY."
    The truth is, I find RELIGION or FAITH interesting. It has some very good points, but it also has some questionable attributes too.
    It is true that I oppose any specific religion dictating our laws. For some reason, SNIC and others keep claiming this is country is founded on Christian beliefs, and that just isn't true. In fact, the founding fathers rejected the use of Christianity in the Constitution.

    For a final point as to credibility, SNIC and others have been critical of me because they don't know personal things about me, even though they continually post as though they do.
    Such as, Whether I have Job or I don't, whether I live in someones basement or a large house, whether I am a Liberal or a Conservative, whether I have a boat or I don't. The truth is, my personal life is not important when discussing issues.
    What matters is, is it the truth or perhaps it's just an opinion.
    SNIC doesn't seem to feel truth is important, he has often changed words, which also changed the meaning to suit his needs. Many times he has changed what I said, but often changes or leaves out portions of what an article says.

    In SNICS last post, he says, "Why else would he participate in a Performance Boat forum and he does not even own a boat and has never shown any interest thereof."
    SNIC has posted this numerous times. One can only wonder why, but it demonstrates why I call him a liar, again.
    I will refer to him as stupid again, as it is very easy to click on our board name to look at my previous posts to see if I appear to have a boat, or maybe two and what my knowledge level that I share is. I think you will find SNICS knowledge of boats that he shares almost nonexistent.
    I feel safe to say that I've owned a boat longer than SNIC.
  • 02-11-2016, 06:23 PM
    SNiC
    Quote Originally Posted by f_inscreenname View Post
    Youíre smarter than me SNiC. I like to engage with people like Jim to see what they are thinking from their prospective. Iím not into the mindless insults. If you just into trolling all I can say is donít say something you wouldnít say to my face cause Iím pretty good with this PC stuff and more than likely Iíll find you for real if I want to. Thatís why I refuse to open a facebook page just so I canít post on any news stories. Some of those keyboard cowboys deserve a serious smackdown but I gave that up. So I just donít engage with many online about political stuff except here. If I blocked anyone I wouldnít have anyone to play with. Lol.
    Marko dropped the ball but it happens to the best of us. Does he scurry and shy away like Cam Newton or does he jump in head first like a Ben Roethlisberger and fight for it is the question. I think today he is going after the dragon by attacking Trump. Weíll see how that works out. I donít like Ted. Dirty tricks and slimy ways (not to mention he is way to right) is Ted. I swear if you put the guy in a green suite with question marks all over it he would make the perfect joker in a batman movie. I would still vote for him over Hillary. Like I said when all those Reps sat home last time because Mitt wasnít their guy, anyone would have been better then what we have, even Mitt.
    Don Ö. I wonder what he would be like as a potus. Iím sure he would drop the act and ďget a little classĒ after. If you ever watched anything about him prior to the announcement of his running he is nothing like his persona. Iím also sure he will get good people under him and be more of the mouth piece kind of Pres like Obama is. He just says or thinks it and then tells his people to make it happen but unlike Obama it has to happen with the benefits out weighing the costs not the other way around. Donít drink or smoke and already has money and just by being potus his empire will explode and he wonít have to do anything dirty like Hillary did to make it happen. Even though he is not my guy it would be easier voting for him then Ted.
    I once again have to agree with you Jim. It was too early for Marko to focus solely on the general when the barbarians were at the door. Just like Hillaryís super pac did in NH. He should have had an overall message but he did forget about today. Donít think that will happen again but it may be already to late. Now if he was Hillary he could just blame it on a right wing conspiracy because she repeats all kinds of things over and over. Even her concession speech nothing but her stump speech (just mangled up) she has used for weeks.
    Back to settling to Hillary, today it came out that her aids handled top secret emails also. How long before one of them roll over???
    You and I may be a lot in common in these regards and I seriously doubt that I am smarter than you.

    I used to read Jim's posts as I too am interested with others opposing views. But when he post his off topic irrelevant Liberal BS and you call him out on it by presenting him with undisputed opposing facts, (as I have done many many times over) he goes daffy duck on you, changes the subject, and starts with the childish name calling and personal insults including insults and attacks against my faith. His actions reveal the true content of his character and I simply do not need that needless aggravation in my life. I will not take that from Jim or anyone else for that matter. If Jim chooses not to "believe" that his his business, but there is no reason to attack those of us who do believe. I have posted on this forum for several years and have seen Jim's posts run in cycles, and at times he can discuss sensibly, but those very few times are far between and quickly diminished when he goes nuts and daffy. Therefore, I elect to Ignore Jimsplace and I will continue getting Liberal perspectives from other Liberal forum members and from respectful published sources and the likes of Progressive Radio without having to endure the personal childish insults and repulsive religious attacks from the likes of a proud Troll named Jim who's only intent and interest is to be a perpetual disruptive pest. Why else would he participate in a Performance Boat forum and he does not even own a boat and has never shown any interest thereof. I simply choose to not give him the opportunity to satisfy his disruptive pleasures.

    Now back to topic,
    Due to these latest on Hillary's emails, there is NO WAY she should get a pass on this. David Petraeus revealed to only one other person the classified information in his possession, and now Hillary's staff's fingerprints are all over these classified emails and her I.T. guy has taken the 5th. This is going to get interesting.....

    And BTW, Cruz as Batman's Joker, I think he would make a better Pinquin


  • 02-11-2016, 04:15 PM
    jimsplace
    Quote Originally Posted by f_inscreenname View Post
    Youíre smarter than me SNiC. I like to engage with people like Jim to see what they are thinking from their prospective. Iím not into the mindless insults. If you just into trolling all I can say is donít say something you wouldnít say to my face cause Iím pretty good with this PC stuff and more than likely Iíll find you for real if I want to. Thatís why I refuse to open a facebook page just so I canít post on any news stories. Some of those keyboard cowboys deserve a serious smackdown but I gave that up. So I just donít engage with many online about political stuff except here. If I blocked anyone I wouldnít have anyone to play with. Lol.
    Marko dropped the ball but it happens to the best of us. Does he scurry and shy away like Cam Newton or does he jump in head first like a Ben Roethlisberger and fight for it is the question. I think today he is going after the dragon by attacking Trump. Weíll see how that works out. I donít like Ted. Dirty tricks and slimy ways (not to mention he is way to right) is Ted. I swear if you put the guy in a green suite with question marks all over it he would make the perfect joker in a batman movie. I would still vote for him over Hillary. Like I said when all those Reps sat home last time because Mitt wasnít their guy, anyone would have been better then what we have, even Mitt.
    Don Ö. I wonder what he would be like as a potus. Iím sure he would drop the act and ďget a little classĒ after. If you ever watched anything about him prior to the announcement of his running he is nothing like his persona. Iím also sure he will get good people under him and be more of the mouth piece kind of Pres like Obama is. He just says or thinks it and then tells his people to make it happen but unlike Obama it has to happen with the benefits out weighing the costs not the other way around. Donít drink or smoke and already has money and just by being potus his empire will explode and he wonít have to do anything dirty like Hillary did to make it happen. Even though he is not my guy it would be easier voting for him then Ted.
    I once again have to agree with you Jim. It was too early for Marko to focus solely on the general when the barbarians were at the door. Just like Hillaryís super pac did in NH. He should have had an overall message but he did forget about today. Donít think that will happen again but it may be already to late. Now if he was Hillary he could just blame it on a right wing conspiracy because she repeats all kinds of things over and over. Even her concession speech nothing but her stump speech (just mangled up) she has used for weeks.
    Back to settling to Hillary, today it came out that her aids handled top secret emails also. How long before one of them roll over???
    "I once again have to agree with you Jim." I'll bet it wasn't easy to write that, and you'll probably get chastised for it. LOL
    I appreciate the opportunity for you to, "Engage with people like Jim to see what they are thinking from their prospective." I do too.
    You're right there is a lot of name calling which is unfortunate, as the topic usually goes downhill. There are some, actually many, who do nothing but do that, which accomplishes nothing.
    I can't deny that I do my share, but it's seldom that I start it. Once it's started, I can do it too.
    While you and I have had differences of opinion, maybe. We still are sharing our position and sometimes those differences aren't that great.
    What I object too, is when certain people post inflammatory or hateful subject matter that is often untrue or written from an extremest viewpoint.
    As you've probably noticed, I take issue with those who put inappropriate labels on individuals or topics, and I dislike stereotyping.
  • 02-11-2016, 02:22 PM
    f_inscreenname
    Youíre smarter than me SNiC. I like to engage with people like Jim to see what they are thinking from their prospective. Iím not into the mindless insults. If you just into trolling all I can say is donít say something you wouldnít say to my face cause Iím pretty good with this PC stuff and more than likely Iíll find you for real if I want to. Thatís why I refuse to open a facebook page just so I canít post on any news stories. Some of those keyboard cowboys deserve a serious smackdown but I gave that up. So I just donít engage with many online about political stuff except here. If I blocked anyone I wouldnít have anyone to play with. Lol.
    Marko dropped the ball but it happens to the best of us. Does he scurry and shy away like Cam Newton or does he jump in head first like a Ben Roethlisberger and fight for it is the question. I think today he is going after the dragon by attacking Trump. Weíll see how that works out. I donít like Ted. Dirty tricks and slimy ways (not to mention he is way to right) is Ted. I swear if you put the guy in a green suite with question marks all over it he would make the perfect joker in a batman movie. I would still vote for him over Hillary. Like I said when all those Reps sat home last time because Mitt wasnít their guy, anyone would have been better then what we have, even Mitt.
    Don Ö. I wonder what he would be like as a potus. Iím sure he would drop the act and ďget a little classĒ after. If you ever watched anything about him prior to the announcement of his running he is nothing like his persona. Iím also sure he will get good people under him and be more of the mouth piece kind of Pres like Obama is. He just says or thinks it and then tells his people to make it happen but unlike Obama it has to happen with the benefits out weighing the costs not the other way around. Donít drink or smoke and already has money and just by being potus his empire will explode and he wonít have to do anything dirty like Hillary did to make it happen. Even though he is not my guy it would be easier voting for him then Ted.
    I once again have to agree with you Jim. It was too early for Marko to focus solely on the general when the barbarians were at the door. Just like Hillaryís super pac did in NH. He should have had an overall message but he did forget about today. Donít think that will happen again but it may be already to late. Now if he was Hillary he could just blame it on a right wing conspiracy because she repeats all kinds of things over and over. Even her concession speech nothing but her stump speech (just mangled up) she has used for weeks.
    Back to settling to Hillary, today it came out that her aids handled top secret emails also. How long before one of them roll over???
  • 02-11-2016, 10:25 AM
    jimsplace
    Quote Originally Posted by f_inscreenname View Post
    Hate to say it SNiC but Jim is right. Imagine if Marcoís brain fart was during the general election. He had to have known that one of the Govís was coming at him in that debate. He just was not prepared for the political kamikaze of Christie and his tactics. Kamikaze Chris did no one any favors by doing what he did the way he did. Every one of these people on both sides repeats things over and over, even Chris does. It was low but Marko should have been able to easily defend off by a few mentions of Christieís own issues in his own state. Like when Chris talks about leadership but yet he was not in his own state 400 days so far of this term as Gov of NJ. Couldnít wait to be on camera with Obama back during hurricane Sandy but when flooding happened in So Jersey during the last blizzard a couple weeks ago his reply to a question of why he was not there was, ďwhat you want me to do go down there with a mopĒ. And there is so much more Marco could have gone after but you never try to out argue with a prosecutor over something stupid. Should have just herd what he had to say then shut him down like Trump would have done. I like the kid and hope he can recover but if not Iím glad it came out now.
    It wasn't just Christy that picked up on Rubio's repetition, anyone paying attention picked up on it and questioned why it was necessary to repeat the same thing over and over.
    If Christy hadn't said something, someone else would have.
    Rubio's attack on Obama was in the wrong place, he's not running against Obama.
    If the candidates don't know who their competitor is right then, they shouldn't be running.
    Rubio has Tunnel Vision.
  • 02-10-2016, 10:04 PM
    SNiC
    Quote Originally Posted by f_inscreenname View Post
    Hate to say it SNiC but Jim is right. Imagine if Marcoís brain fart was during the general election. He had to have known that one of the Govís was coming at him in that debate. He just was not prepared for the political kamikaze of Christie and his tactics. Kamikaze Chris did no one any favors by doing what he did the way he did. Every one of these people on both sides repeats things over and over, even Chris does. It was low but Marko should have been able to easily defend off by a few mentions of Christieís own issues in his own state. Like when Chris talks about leadership but yet he was not in his own state 400 days so far of this term as Gov of NJ. Couldnít wait to be on camera with Obama back during hurricane Sandy but when flooding happened in So Jersey during the last blizzard a couple weeks ago his reply to a question of why he was not there was, ďwhat you want me to do go down there with a mopĒ. And there is so much more Marco could have gone after but you never try to out argue with a prosecutor over something stupid. Should have just herd what he had to say then shut him down like Trump would have done. I like the kid and hope he can recover but if not Iím glad it came out now.
    No argument here, but I have no idea what Jim said as I have him "Blocked" via the ignore function. I was just venting my frustrations with this whole situation. Christie did not stand a chance of succeeding but yet in his desperation he elected to take down the "GOP + Independent" front runner polling to defeat Hillary, and did so only to satisfy his own ego. In my book, that makes Christie a self centered RHINO POS! But sadly, I can offer no defense for Rubio, he did stumble and he should have stood taller. Perhaps Rubio can recover because frankly, Trump scares the hell out of me and Cruz (IMO) is already bought and sold....
  • 02-10-2016, 08:51 PM
    f_inscreenname
    Hate to say it SNiC but Jim is right. Imagine if Marcoís brain fart was during the general election. He had to have known that one of the Govís was coming at him in that debate. He just was not prepared for the political kamikaze of Christie and his tactics. Kamikaze Chris did no one any favors by doing what he did the way he did. Every one of these people on both sides repeats things over and over, even Chris does. It was low but Marko should have been able to easily defend off by a few mentions of Christieís own issues in his own state. Like when Chris talks about leadership but yet he was not in his own state 400 days so far of this term as Gov of NJ. Couldnít wait to be on camera with Obama back during hurricane Sandy but when flooding happened in So Jersey during the last blizzard a couple weeks ago his reply to a question of why he was not there was, ďwhat you want me to do go down there with a mopĒ. And there is so much more Marco could have gone after but you never try to out argue with a prosecutor over something stupid. Should have just herd what he had to say then shut him down like Trump would have done. I like the kid and hope he can recover but if not Iím glad it came out now.
  • 02-10-2016, 07:06 PM
    SNiC

    Choose Hell over Hillary!

    Madeleine Albright, the first ever female Secretary of State, told supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton that "there's a special place in hell" for women who don't help each other. - http://wapo.st/1mkRM4s

    Well......55% of New Hampshire women chose Hell over Hillary


  • 02-10-2016, 06:33 PM
    jimsplace
    Quote Originally Posted by SNiC View Post
    BREAKING: Chris Christie To Drop Out of Presidential Race

    I hope Christie is pleased with himself because polls show Rubio "had" the best chance of defeating the Dems. You can always tell who the Dems fear the most by the level and number of Media and PAC attacks....
    Attachment 848914
    Why is it Christie's fault? Rubio screwed up and showed what he's made of, that's what debates are for.
    If he can't respond with a credible answer to Christie, why can't he? How do you suppose he would do negotiating with other smarter world leaders?
    You'd think he was running against Obama from his rhetoric, but guess what, he isn't.
    Were you not aware that Christie was running against him for the same Office? Christie was not in the Debate to pander to Rubio, in case you weren't aware.

    Apparently Rubio appeals to idiots like you that fells it necessary to thank Jesus or God every time he speaks. Again, guess what, they aren't voting.
    He's a lot like you apparently, if he repeats something often enough, he'll think people will believe it's true, whether it's true or not.
    How many times did he think it would take before people heard him? Does he think everyone is hard of hearing, or just stupid and can't remember phrases more than about two minutes?

    Your vision and his, is more like Tunnel Vision.
    But, place the blame where it belongs.
  • 02-10-2016, 12:15 PM
    SNiC
    Quote Originally Posted by f_inscreenname View Post
    Hillary's people were really on their game. Getting their asses beat and their super pac is sending people in robot costumes to Rubio rallies.

    Hilarious: Costumed ‚ÄėSupporters‚Äô Show Up to Marco Rubio Rally to Meet Marco Roboto | Mediaite
    BREAKING: Chris Christie To Drop Out of Presidential Race

    I hope Christie is pleased with himself because polls show Rubio "had" the best chance of defeating the Dems. You can always tell who the Dems fear the most by the level and number of Media and PAC attacks....

  • 02-10-2016, 11:39 AM
    f_inscreenname
    Hillary's people were really on their game. Getting their asses beat and their super pac is sending people in robot costumes to Rubio rallies.

    Hilarious: Costumed ‚ÄėSupporters‚Äô Show Up to Marco Rubio Rally to Meet Marco Roboto | Mediaite
  • 02-10-2016, 11:27 AM
    Forkin' Crazy
    Quote Originally Posted by f_inscreenname View Post
    Also is there any lawyers in the house?
    Hillary told a story of about a son and mother she met that both worked at the counter of the same convenience store and the mother was there longer and makes less money (the whole gender inequality thing). Wouldn't that be a lawsuit? Hillary being a lawyer and advocate for women's rights since she was in the womb I would hope she did more then just listen to the story to use a stump talking point. Also if Sandra Fluke (a rich Georgetown law student) was the poster child for free birth control you would think Hillary would have paraded this poor, underpaid, taken advantage of mother out for all to see but her people dropped the ball again if it happened like she said.
    Wish someone would look into that.
    She touts women's rights and equal pay, but pays her male staffers more than her female staffers.
  • 02-10-2016, 07:55 AM
    SNiC
    Quote Originally Posted by f_inscreenname View Post
    ....Hillary told a story.....
    Enough said
This thread has more than 14 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95