Romney
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread:
Romney

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    364

    Default Romney

    May 9, 2012
    After the election of President Barack Obama, the Republicans made a public proclamation that their No. 1 priority was to make Obama a one-term president. Their top priority wasn't to balance the budget or rejuvenate the economy, bring peace in the Middle East or attempt to solve the problems in our medical care. Their priority one became an all-out attempt to obstruct the president, not to do what the country needed or requiredIn the two years that President Obama had a Democratic majority in Congress, it was all-out filibuster in the Senate. Even the president's appointments were filibustered so that a 60-vote majority was required, allowing the Republicans to obstruct virtually everything.
    Mitt Romney is beginning to announce what he intends to do. He wants to give more tax breaks to the wealthy and eliminate any programs that benefit any wage-earner or average American. Any wage-earner who votes for Romney is straitght nuts

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member Jake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daMoose View Post
    May 9, 2012
    After the election of President Barack Obama, the Republicans made a public proclamation that their No. 1 priority was to make Obama a one-term president. Their top priority wasn't to balance the budget or rejuvenate the economy, bring peace in the Middle East or attempt to solve the problems in our medical care. Their priority one became an all-out attempt to obstruct the president, not to do what the country needed or requiredIn the two years that President Obama had a Democratic majority in Congress, it was all-out filibuster in the Senate. Even the president's appointments were filibustered so that a 60-vote majority was required, allowing the Republicans to obstruct virtually everything.
    Mitt Romney is beginning to announce what he intends to do. He wants to give more tax breaks to the wealthy and eliminate any programs that benefit any wage-earner or average American. Any wage-earner who votes for Romney is straitght nuts

    aaah, what's your point genius.

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jake View Post
    aaah, what's your point genius.
    You just made it

  5. #4
    Living in a cage of fear thatguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Redding, CA
    Posts
    16,456

    Default

    Your' entire post is based on the premise that O is doing the right things, or attempting to do the right things for this Country.

    Many will disagree, and believe it is a very good thing that he is stalemated as much as possible.
    Tommy
    Quote Originally Posted by Rexone View Post
    Tommy please remove all Jimsplace quotes from your sig and don't put more back. He doesn't like it and it is against the rules. Thank you.
    "So as through a glass, and darkly
    The age long strife I see
    Where I fought in many guises,
    Many names, but always me."

    Gen. George S Patton

  6. #5
    Impeachment! 75 TX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Culver City, Ca
    Posts
    3,728

    Default

    I shouldn't even respond, but I have 30 seconds to piss away on a libtard so here goes.
    When romney wins with 55% or more of the vote does that mean that the majority of voters are nuts? He's gonna win, likely in a landslide. Accept it.
    I'd rather be nuts than a brain dead retard....which is what ANYONE who votes for the mutt nobama is.

  7. #6
    Senior Member Boss460's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daMoose View Post
    May 9, 2012
    After the election of President Barack Obama, the Republicans made a public proclamation that their No. 1 priority was to make Obama a one-term president. Their top priority wasn't to balance the budget or rejuvenate the economy, bring peace in the Middle East or attempt to solve the problems in our medical care. Their priority one became an all-out attempt to obstruct the president, not to do what the country needed or requiredIn the two years that President Obama had a Democratic majority in Congress, it was all-out filibuster in the Senate. Even the president's appointments were filibustered so that a 60-vote majority was required, allowing the Republicans to obstruct virtually everything.
    Mitt Romney is beginning to announce what he intends to do. He wants to give more tax breaks to the wealthy and eliminate any programs that benefit any wage-earner or average American. Any wage-earner who votes for Romney is straitght nuts
    I will say straight up now you aren't ram or anyone else. You are a far left blinders on guy just as much as the far right guys here. Downright nuts. Your first paragraph is complete crap. The GOP has tried to present their own budgets and own ideas on fixing things. They were simply ignored. To say they were just obstructing everything is pure fiction just because they wanted to do it differently.

    Your second paragraph is even more nuts than the first. Please direct me to the extremist statements Romney has made against wage earners and where he plans to eliminate anything helping average americans.

    Opinion post. And in return you get mine. You have your head crammed so far up obamas ass that you are just as blind as the true Obama haters here. Hello and welcome to the same group of people that push the birther agenda. You are just as nuts and extreme.
    Quote Originally Posted by steelcomp View Post
    I don't hate anyone.
    Quote Originally Posted by steelcomp View Post
    I don't argue religious idology.

  8. #7
    mjc
    mjc is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    moreno valley / LHC
    Posts
    560

    Default

    The biggest obstructionist right now would be Harry Reid and is he not a democrat?

  9. #8
    Senior Member baja1000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    AKA Lenny from Ca./Willow Valley
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    My wife and I have taken a big cut in wages so how am I nuts to vote for Romney,millions are unemployed,never in history has there been so many on food stamps,and this Jackass has almost spent 5 Trillion in less then four years,you got to be brain dead to vote for ZERO again,at least Zombe is voting for Johnson........Any body but Obama 2012
    89 Mirage
    07 Magic deck boat

    ANY BODY BUT OBAMA !!!!!!!!

  10. #9
    Senior Member AzMandella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tucson,Az
    Posts
    5,217

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daMoose View Post
    May 9, 2012
    After the election of President Barack Obama, the Republicans made a public proclamation that their No. 1 priority was to make Obama a one-term president. Their top priority wasn't to balance the budget or rejuvenate the economy, bring peace in the Middle East or attempt to solve the problems in our medical care. Their priority one became an all-out attempt to obstruct the president, not to do what the country needed or requiredIn the two years that President Obama had a Democratic majority in Congress, it was all-out filibuster in the Senate. Even the president's appointments were filibustered so that a 60-vote majority was required, allowing the Republicans to obstruct virtually everything.
    Mitt Romney is beginning to announce what he intends to do. He wants to give more tax breaks to the wealthy and eliminate any programs that benefit any wage-earner or average American. Any wage-earner who votes for Romney is straitght nuts
    Hey moron answer this for me. In order for the Rep to balance the budget, fix our medical care system, or rejuvenate the economy. Wouldn't the first thing they would have to do is get rid of O and elect a Pres who was willing to sign bills that actually fixed the problems rather than create Gov takeovers and continue to make the economy and energy prices worse And priority 2 would be to win the Senate. Then they can actually do something. Only whacko's like you actually believe this obstroction BS. Funny how if the Dems don't like the the bills passed by the house and Reid just throws the bills in the corner not letting anyone look at them in the Senate it's not obstructionism. You really are a peety little delusional, waste of skin, oxygen thief.
    If you voted for Obama to prove you were not racist, then you better find someone else to vote for to prove your not stupid.

  11. #10
    058
    058 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,115

    Default

    Damouse.....another drive-by poster with absolutly nothing of value to contribute. His blatherings are nothing but the fabrications and fantisies of an uninformed, demented and small mind, Respond at your own risk.
    Within the heart of every stray lies the singular desire to be loved. "Good grief you're an irritating blowhard...." [Tex 6/16/11]

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Tags for this Thread

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95