I was reminded of this controversy from another thread. We don't need to forget this.How do you like the part in bold? Sounds a lot like the views of some of the liberals that post in here.The case at hand was filed against the Social Security Administration because Obama’s number indicates a Connecticut residency, yet there is no evidence he ever lived in the state. He claims he grew up in Hawaii and apparently had a Social Security Number there, as he reported he worked in a Honolulu ice-cream shop.
The judge, Royce Lamberth, credited Taitz for her dedication to her cause but said that “today is not her lucky day.”
He concluded that there’s no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, arguing that the need for privacy for the president trumps all else.
“The SSA explained that the Privacy Act of 1974 … protects the personal information of social security number holders,” he wrote. “The SSA determined … the plaintiff had identified no public interest that would be served by disclosure.
Judge rules on Obama’s Social Security Number