Finestein...........Is she stupid or just plain damn ignorant
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 14 of 31

Thread:
Finestein...........Is she stupid or just plain damn ignorant

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    958

    Default Finestein...........Is she stupid or just plain damn ignorant

    Did any of you guys see the speach she made on the magazine ban crap? "It's a Federal regulation that you hunt ducks in this country with no more than three bullets in your gun." she says first then "But it's legal to hunt humans with a 30,50,100, round clip" What is up with this dumb bitch? I didn't think there was anywhere you COULD hunt humans in this country. WTF

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Stupid, ignorant and ugly......................

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    1,449

    Default

    She is my Senator, after I saw her little lame rant at Sen. Cruz. I e-mailed her, with the observation that her ignorance was a disgrace to the office and suggested she should retire. Does anyone think I will get a reply?

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J. Shelfo Sr. View Post
    She is my Senator, after I saw her little lame rant at Sen. Cruz. I e-mailed her, with the observation that her ignorance was a disgrace to the office and suggested she should retire. Does anyone think I will get a reply?
    No only and IRS audit

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    1,449

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MSDC View Post
    No only and IRS audit
    Would not be surprised. I think the audit might bore the IRS. Being on a fixed income for quite a few years make the numbers very close year to year.

  7. #6
    I don't feel tardy Hallett Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J. Shelfo Sr. View Post
    She is my Senator, after I saw her little lame rant at Sen. Cruz. I e-mailed her, with the observation that her ignorance was a disgrace to the office and suggested she should retire. Does anyone think I will get a reply?
    Yes Joe and it will more than likely be very similar to the reply that I received from the Hag.

    Dear Dave:

    Thank you for contacting me to share your opposition to assault weapons legislation. I respect your opinion on this important issue and welcome the opportunity to provide my point of view.

    Mass shootings are a serious problem in our country, and I have watched this problem get worse and worse over the 40 years I have been in public life. From the 1966 shooting rampage at the University of Texas that killed 14 people and wounded 32 others, to the Newtown massacre that killed 20 children and 6 school teachers and faculty, I have seen more and more of these killings. I have had families tell me that they no longer feel safe in a mall, in a movie theater, in their business, and in other public places, because these deadly weapons are so readily available. These assault weapons too often fall into the hands of grievance killers, juveniles, gangs, and the deranged.

    I recognize that the Second Amendment provides an individual right to bear arms, but I do not believe that right is unlimited or that it precludes taking action to prevent mass shootings. Indeed, in the same Supreme Court decision that recognized the individual right to bear arms, District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court also held that this right, like other constitutional rights, is not unlimited. That is why assault weapons bans have consistently been upheld in the courts, both before and after the Heller decision. I believe regulation of these weapons is appropriate.


    Once again, thank you for your letter. Although we may disagree, I appreciate hearing from you and will be mindful of your thoughts as the debate on this issue continues. If you have any additional comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841.

    Sincerely yours,


    Dianne Feinstein
    United States Senator
    Quote Originally Posted by Futs View Post
    Im non induced and My turd leaves pretty hard as she sits.

  8. #7
    a.k.a. "Mean Pair" Nice Pair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    I want out of Kalifornia
    Posts
    5,950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hallett Dave View Post
    Yes Joe and it will more than likely be very similar to the reply that I received from the Hag.

    Dear Dave:

    Thank you for contacting me to share your opposition to assault weapons legislation. I respect your opinion on this important issue and welcome the opportunity to provide my point of view.

    Mass shootings are a serious problem in our country, and I have watched this problem get worse and worse over the 40 years I have been in public life. From the 1966 shooting rampage at the University of Texas that killed 14 people and wounded 32 others, to the Newtown massacre that killed 20 children and 6 school teachers and faculty, I have seen more and more of these killings. I have had families tell me that they no longer feel safe in a mall, in a movie theater, in their business, and in other public places, because these deadly weapons are so readily available. These assault weapons too often fall into the hands of grievance killers, juveniles, gangs, and the deranged.

    I recognize that the Second Amendment provides an individual right to bear arms, but I do not believe that right is unlimited or that it precludes taking action to prevent mass shootings. Indeed, in the same Supreme Court decision that recognized the individual right to bear arms, District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court also held that this right, like other constitutional rights, is not unlimited. That is why assault weapons bans have consistently been upheld in the courts, both before and after the Heller decision. I believe regulation of these weapons is appropriate.


    Once again, thank you for your letter. Although we may disagree, I appreciate hearing from you and will be mindful of your thoughts as the debate on this issue continues. If you have any additional comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841.

    Sincerely yours,


    Dianne Feinstein
    United States Senator
    That's the same one I got when I asked how to care for my new goldfish.



  9. #8
    Senior Member Jake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hallett Dave View Post
    Yes Joe and it will more than likely be very similar to the reply that I received from the Hag.

    Dear Dave:

    Thank you for contacting me to share your opposition to assault weapons legislation. I respect your opinion on this important issue and welcome the opportunity to provide my point of view.

    Mass shootings are a serious problem in our country, and I have watched this problem get worse and worse over the 40 years I have been in public life. From the 1966 shooting rampage at the University of Texas that killed 14 people and wounded 32 others, to the Newtown massacre that killed 20 children and 6 school teachers and faculty, I have seen more and more of these killings. I have had families tell me that they no longer feel safe in a mall, in a movie theater, in their business, and in other public places, because these deadly weapons are so readily available. These assault weapons too often fall into the hands of grievance killers, juveniles, gangs, and the deranged.

    I recognize that the Second Amendment provides an individual right to bear arms, but I do not believe that right is unlimited or that it precludes taking action to prevent mass shootings. Indeed, in the same Supreme Court decision that recognized the individual right to bear arms, District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court also held that this right, like other constitutional rights, is not unlimited. That is why assault weapons bans have consistently been upheld in the courts, both before and after the Heller decision. I believe regulation of these weapons is appropriate.


    Once again, thank you for your letter. Although we may disagree, I appreciate hearing from you and will be mindful of your thoughts as the debate on this issue continues. If you have any additional comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841.

    Sincerely yours,


    Dianne Feinstein
    United States Senator


    I sugest you write back and open the salutation with,

    Dianne, YOU STUPID BITCH! or maybe,

    Dianne, YOU IGNORANT SLUT and close with


    we don't give a rats ass what YOU think!
    Last edited by Jake; 03-18-2013 at 10:11 PM.

  10. #9
    Senior Member hava life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lake Havasu
    Posts
    784

    Default

    Sad to see that they only push for the cause they want, what is the real issue? Dianne F. is wrong and should look for the real issue. A few things on the bell tower sniper, he killed his wife and mother with a Knife, Charlie Whitman had killed fourteen people and injured dozens more in a little over ninety minutes. It soon became known that Charlie had sought the help of Dr. Heatly some months before. He had no Assault rifles, 35 caliber Remington rifle, a 6mm Remington rifle with a scope, a 357 Magnum Smith & Wesson revolver, a 9mm Luger pistol, and a Galesi-Brescia pistol. Later that morning he would buy two more weapons, a 30 caliber M-1 carbine and a 12-gauge shotgun this according to articles.
    How about what happened to Noveske, Very sad read John Noveske’s last Facebook post » Prominent rifle manufacturer killed in mysterious car crash days after posting psych drug link to school shooters Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

  11. #10
    gn7
    gn7 is offline
    Senior Member gn7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    25,975

    Default

    They ALL are so ignorant its beyond belief. Mass killings. Are you kidding? She has no idea what mass killings look like. But she may learn.
    Its time they ALL learn that hunting ducks is not why we have the 2nd amendment. Nobody in the 1780s was thinking about hunting when they DEMANDED that the Bill of Rights be written. Its a stupid as saying you have the freedom of speech, SO LONG AS ITS NOT AGAINST ANY BRANCH OR AGENCY OF THE GOVERNMENT.

    Every member of the full congress, the executive branch and courts needs a picture like this hanging in their office titled "WHY WE HAVE THE 2ND AMENDMENT"
    THEY , none of them, are comfortable with the fact that THEY are the reason for the 2nd amendment. They REFUSE to accept that.





    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

  12. #11
    Senior Member Jake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gn7 View Post
    They ALL are so ignorant its beyond belief. Mass killings. Are you kidding? She has no idea what mass killings look like. But she may learn.
    Its time they ALL learn that hunting ducks is not why we have the 2nd amendment. Nobody in the 1780s was thinking about hunting when they DEMANDED that the Bill of Rights be written. Its a stupid as saying you have the freedom of speech, SO LONG AS ITS NOT AGAINST ANY BRANCH OR AGENCY OF THE GOVERNMENT.

    Every member of the full congress, the executive branch and courts needs a picture like this hanging in their office titled "WHY WE HAVE THE 2ND AMENDMENT"
    THEY , none of them, are comfortable with the fact that THEY are the reason for the 2nd amendment. They REFUSE to accept that.



    No truer words than this, our elected officials are worried about saving their own asses!


    While we're on the subject, let's get right down to their push to get rid of OUR GUNS!!!!

    It is becoming painfully evident that our watch dogs, that we voted in, have legislated so much of our wealth away that we common folk will never be able to pay the interest much less the balance. We owe trillions of dollars besides the national debt that we will never will be able to pay for it. When that day comes for collecting those debts "the shit is going to hit the fan" and your going to need your guns to protect yourself from those who come to collect! RUBBISH YOU SAY, wait and see, it's coming!!!! That's the REAL reason they want you guns. Be a 'new order patriot' and be prepared to fight for your own possestions!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Doubters, book mark this responce, as sure as I'm sitting here it'll happen, maybe not today maybe not tomorrow, but it's coming!!!

    and that's the REAL reason for this interest in gun control!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Last edited by Jake; 03-18-2013 at 11:23 PM.

  13. #12
    Red Blooded American The Doctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Peoria, AZ
    Posts
    15,853

    Default

    She's the perfect democrat! Poster gal material, she is!
    The best things in life aren't things!

  14. #13
    gn7
    gn7 is offline
    Senior Member gn7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    25,975

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jake View Post
    No truer words than this, our elected officials worried about saving their own asses!
    R&J posted awhile back that if you don't want the government to hunt you down and kill you with a drone, its best not to fight you government.
    I guess we should all be thankful that HE wasn't around in 1776.
    The government, all the presidents, all the members of congress, of all the sessions, and all the members of all the courts, and all the agencies, throughout the history of the country are THEE reason for the 2nd amendment.

    My VERSION of R&Js post is: maybe it would be in the best interest of the goverment not to go against the PEOPLE, and the CONSTITUTION.
    The PEOPLE and CONSTITUTION are the LAW in this country. Not the government, or the courts. WE AND THAT PAPER ARE! The paper CANNOT defend itself. That is SUPPOSE to be the job of the military. When they FAIL(epic), then it falls on us!
    Regardless what some military types may try to convince otherwise, being a branch of the government, even they are a potentially a usefull tool of a tyranntical (illegal) government if they CHOOSE to be.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
    Last edited by gn7; 03-18-2013 at 11:17 PM.

  15. #14
    Senior Member Jake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gn7 View Post
    R&J posted awhile back that if you don't want the government to hunt you down and kill you with a drone, its best not to fight you government.
    I guess we should all be thankful that HE wasn't around in 1776.
    The government, all the presidents, all the members of congress, of all the sessions, and all the members of all the courts, and all the agencies, throughout the history of the country are THEE reason for the 2nd amendment.

    My VERSION of R&Js post is: maybe it would be in the best interest of the goverment not to go against the PEOPLE, and the CONSTITUTION.
    The PEOPLE and CONSTITUTION are the LAW in this country. Not the government, or the courts. WE AND THAT PAPER ARE! The paper CANNOT defend itself. That is SUPPOSE to be the job of the military. When they FAIL(epic), then it falls on us!
    Regardless what some military types may try to convince otherwise, being a branch of the government, even they are a potentially a usefull tool of a tyranntical (illegal) government if they CHOOSE to be.

    Back up and read my amended post, it's coming and that's the real reason for the renewed interest in GUN THEFT!!!!!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Tags for this Thread

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95