Al Gore has now outdone himself!!!
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 4 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 14 of 242

Thread:
Al Gore has now outdone himself!!!

  1. #1
    Red Blooded American The Doctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Peoria, AZ
    Posts
    15,853

    Default Al Gore has now outdone himself!!!

    The man with no clue about weather has now announced that all this snow and the record low temp all over the northern hemisphere are due to . . .


    . . . you're not going to believe it . . .



    . . . global warming! Yep! the genius of nothing but professor of all things weather environment is proud to say it's because of global warming that we are so freaking cold.

    I wonder if he also thinks our deficit is somehow related to spending????

    Who buys this guys crap? And Why?
    The best things in life aren't things!

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements

  3. #2
    Scarab Racing Run_em_Hard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    214

    Default

    I love how these "experts" complain when it is anything but normal. No matter where you are in the world you have cold years and you have warm years. You have wet years and you have dry years. Its as simple as that.

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6,914

    Default

    Can you believe this douch bag was vice President of the USA for eight years and was almost elected President. At least be happy he is now happily running a global weather con scheme and not involved in running our nation anymore.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    93

    Default

    I asked a friend of mine who works for the National Weather Service about the change in the weather.

    He was able to explain it to me in very simple terms.

    It is normal for the weather to fluctuate.

    That is why you have changing record highs and lows over long periods of time.

  6. #5
    "I'm just SPRAYIN' man!!" '78 Crusader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    McKinney, Texas
    Posts
    618

    Default

    Al Gore = Complete idiot. It's just as plain and simple as that.

    This guy is an Ass Clown and has no credibility whatsoever. Here's a guy who's preaching global warming yet his carbon footprint far exceeds most Americans. Talk about a hypocrite....oh ya, he's a Libturd....that explains it all.
    Cliff
    1978 21' Crusader, 466 CID BBF, Berkely Jet
    1966 13' Boston Whaler sport, 40 HP Yamaha Two Smoker

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Doctor View Post
    The man with no clue about weather has now announced that all this snow and the record low temp all over the northern hemisphere are due to . . .


    . . . you're not going to believe it . . .



    . . . global warming! Yep! the genius of nothing but professor of all things weather environment is proud to say it's because of global warming that we are so freaking cold.

    I wonder if he also thinks our deficit is somehow related to spending????

    Who buys this guys crap? And Why?
    Actually he might be correct! When people speak of global warming, they are not talking about one specific area or that everyplace in the world is getting warmer. What they are really referring to is a global climate change. Areas that normally are dry and warm are cooling and seeing more rain fall were as areas like the northern and southern poles are seeing higher temps and melting the polar caps. Global warming means the average temperature of earth is getting warmer. We know that global warming, climate change, is accruing; this is a true fact. The question is how much has been accelerated by mankind verses what happens naturally. Some people donít want to believe mankind has contributed to the warming effect because that means they would have to make changes in their daily lives and routine and they refuse to do that; basically they are being selfish.
    There are three ways to look at the situation. First, we say it is not happening and there for we should do nothing and continue the way we have for the last 100 industrial years. The problem with this rational is if we discover later that humans have caused an acceleration in global warming, aka climate change, it might be too late to make changes or we will have to take even more drastic measure to correct or slow down the problem. The worst case scenario is it is too late to make any changes and future generations will suffer because of their parents or grandparents ignorance. If you are correct and climate changes by human interaction is not happening, then things continue as they are and you do not have to change your way of life. The earth gets warmer and we learn to deal with it. This is like gambling and not hedging your bets. The question I have to ask is, how much are you willing to lose and do you really care about the earth after you are gone? Second choice is we say it is not happening or we think it might be happening, and we take action. We may find later that mankindís interactions had little or no effect on the situation. In this case we made changes but still ended up with the same results. We tried something but still did not make a change. We gambled but hedged our bet and suffered little or the same lose. But if it was partially cased by our life styles and we changed to correct it, then we did the right thing. We made the right bet. The third choice is we have contributed greatly to global warming. Now we make changes that could avert the problem or at least slow it down to maintain a quality of life for future generations.
    My best analogy would be a person that smokes. You are told cigarette smoking is a leading cause of lung cancer and heart disease, but you refuse to listen and instead try to find or seek out information that tends to discount or refute others findings. You are told by your doctor you must quit before it is too late; but you feel fine and enjoy smoking. What you donít see is the slow deterioration of your health until one day you go to the doctorís office feeling run down and tired. After numerous tests the results come back, lung cancer. The next bad news is the doctor tells you it is very advance and aggressive and there is little they can do to stop its growth. You now have a very short time to live and what is left will be very painful for you and your family. A simple change could have added years to your life, more time to be with your loved ones and them to be with you. A selfish act of enjoyment, something you could have changed to make life for you and those around you better and you refused to do it.
    You can make any decision you like, but is your decision based on facts, or because you donít like the people stating the facts. Do you choose to discount global warming because you find nothing to support it or because of your dislike of Al Gore and refusing to believe anything he says as Truth? If this is your way of rationalizing a problem, them Iím guessing you have made many errors in judgment in the past and will continue to make them in the future.

  8. #7
    "I'm just SPRAYIN' man!!" '78 Crusader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    McKinney, Texas
    Posts
    618

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by itsmeagain View Post
    Actually he might be correct! When people speak of global warming, they are not talking about one specific area or that everyplace in the world is getting warmer. What they are really referring to is a global climate change. Areas that normally are dry and warm are cooling and seeing more rain fall were as areas like the northern and southern poles are seeing higher temps and melting the polar caps. Global warming means the average temperature of earth is getting warmer. We know that global warming, climate change, is accruing; this is a true fact. The question is how much has been accelerated by mankind verses what happens naturally. Some people donít want to believe mankind has contributed to the warming effect because that means they would have to make changes in their daily lives and routine and they refuse to do that; basically they are being selfish.
    There are three ways to look at the situation. First, we say it is not happening and there for we should do nothing and continue the way we have for the last 100 industrial years. The problem with this rational is if we discover later that humans have caused an acceleration in global warming, aka climate change, it might be too late to make changes or we will have to take even more drastic measure to correct or slow down the problem. The worst case scenario is it is too late to make any changes and future generations will suffer because of their parents or grandparents ignorance. If you are correct and climate changes by human interaction is not happening, then things continue as they are and you do not have to change your way of life. The earth gets warmer and we learn to deal with it. This is like gambling and not hedging your bets. The question I have to ask is, how much are you willing to lose and do you really care about the earth after you are gone? Second choice is we say it is not happening or we think it might be happening, and we take action. We may find later that mankindís interactions had little or no effect on the situation. In this case we made changes but still ended up with the same results. We tried something but still did not make a change. We gambled but hedged our bet and suffered little or the same lose. But if it was partially cased by our life styles and we changed to correct it, then we did the right thing. We made the right bet. The third choice is we have contributed greatly to global warming. Now we make changes that could avert the problem or at least slow it down to maintain a quality of life for future generations.
    My best analogy would be a person that smokes. You are told cigarette smoking is a leading cause of lung cancer and heart disease, but you refuse to listen and instead try to find or seek out information that tends to discount or refute others findings. You are told by your doctor you must quit before it is too late; but you feel fine and enjoy smoking. What you donít see is the slow deterioration of your health until one day you go to the doctorís office feeling run down and tired. After numerous tests the results come back, lung cancer. The next bad news is the doctor tells you it is very advance and aggressive and there is little they can do to stop its growth. You now have a very short time to live and what is left will be very painful for you and your family. A simple change could have added years to your life, more time to be with your loved ones and them to be with you. A selfish act of enjoyment, something you could have changed to make life for you and those around you better and you refused to do it.
    You can make any decision you like, but is your decision based on facts, or because you donít like the people stating the facts. Do you choose to discount global warming because you find nothing to support it or because of your dislike of Al Gore and refusing to believe anything he says as Truth? If this is your way of rationalizing a problem, them Iím guessing you have made many errors in judgment in the past and will continue to make them in the future.
    I suggest you lead by example...sell your boat (it's not helping the air at all), turn your heat down to 58, quit driving your tow rig and start cultivating your own vegetables (afterall it takes farm machinery to farm this stuff), ride your bike and walk. Come back in a year and tell us how you did.
    Cliff
    1978 21' Crusader, 466 CID BBF, Berkely Jet
    1966 13' Boston Whaler sport, 40 HP Yamaha Two Smoker

  9. #8
    Already miss the 310/562 2manymustangs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    13,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by itsmeagain View Post
    We know that global warming, climate change, is accruing; this is a true fact.
    Prove it... For every climate scientist that says the earth is warming there is one or more that won't agree...

    WE and our "carbon footprint" are a mere SPEC of dust on a SPEC of dust relative to the atomosphere and our planet earth...

    What about WATER vapor and it's effect on climate change??? What is the GREATEST green house gas of all (besides Al Gores hot air)???

    Quote Originally Posted by '78 Crusader View Post
    I suggest you lead by example...sell your boat (it's not helping the air at all), turn your heat down to 58, quit driving your tow rig and start cultivating your own vegetables (afterall it takes farm machinery to farm this stuff), ride your bike and walk. Come back in a year and tell us how you did.
    Right on... x26!!!
    Pat Eason, the voice of reason...

  10. #9
    Marine Organism Forkin' Crazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Mound, Louisiana
    Posts
    12,743

    Default

    Some people don’t want to believe mankind has contributed to the warming effect because that means they would have to make changes in their daily lives and routine and they refuse to do that; basically they are being selfish.
    You may want to get off your high horse before you get a nose bleed.

    Selfish, no. Using common sense, yes.

    The people on earth have been taking accurate temperature and weather readings for only 150 yrs or so? Boy that makes for some accuracy, huh?

    Didn't they use to grow grapes for wine in the UK many, many years ago, and now it's too cold?
    "An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life"

    - - Robert A. Heinlein

  11. #10
    "On the road again..." Old Texan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    9,356

    Default

    Was that Troll, a complete liberal idiot, or have we go us a hybrid combination??????

    Good riddance "again".
    "Bottle by bottle, I'm clearing off that shelf...."

  12. #11
    Red Blooded American The Doctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Peoria, AZ
    Posts
    15,853

    Default

    Our Heavenly Father is in control of our climate, not Al Gore. Is it changing from time to time? Of course! Who is responsible for the largest concerns environmentally? That would be God again as volcanoes have depleted more of our ozone than man ever could and He maintains the balance far better than even the great Al Gore.

    I think Al is either jealous of God or wants to be him.
    The best things in life aren't things!

  13. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by itsmeagain View Post
    Actually he might be correct! When people speak of global warming, they are not talking about one specific area or that everyplace in the world is getting warmer. What they are really referring to is a global climate change. Areas that normally are dry and warm are cooling and seeing more rain fall were as areas like the northern and southern poles are seeing higher temps and melting the polar caps. Global warming means the average temperature of earth is getting warmer. We know that global warming, climate change, is accruing; this is a true fact. The question is how much has been accelerated by mankind verses what happens naturally. Some people donít want to believe mankind has contributed to the warming effect because that means they would have to make changes in their daily lives and routine and they refuse to do that; basically they are being selfish.
    There are three ways to look at the situation. First, we say it is not happening and there for we should do nothing and continue the way we have for the last 100 industrial years. The problem with this rational is if we discover later that humans have caused an acceleration in global warming, aka climate change, it might be too late to make changes or we will have to take even more drastic measure to correct or slow down the problem. The worst case scenario is it is too late to make any changes and future generations will suffer because of their parents or grandparents ignorance. If you are correct and climate changes by human interaction is not happening, then things continue as they are and you do not have to change your way of life. The earth gets warmer and we learn to deal with it. This is like gambling and not hedging your bets. The question I have to ask is, how much are you willing to lose and do you really care about the earth after you are gone? Second choice is we say it is not happening or we think it might be happening, and we take action. We may find later that mankindís interactions had little or no effect on the situation. In this case we made changes but still ended up with the same results. We tried something but still did not make a change. We gambled but hedged our bet and suffered little or the same lose. But if it was partially cased by our life styles and we changed to correct it, then we did the right thing. We made the right bet. The third choice is we have contributed greatly to global warming. Now we make changes that could avert the problem or at least slow it down to maintain a quality of life for future generations.
    My best analogy would be a person that smokes. You are told cigarette smoking is a leading cause of lung cancer and heart disease, but you refuse to listen and instead try to find or seek out information that tends to discount or refute others findings. You are told by your doctor you must quit before it is too late; but you feel fine and enjoy smoking. What you donít see is the slow deterioration of your health until one day you go to the doctorís office feeling run down and tired. After numerous tests the results come back, lung cancer. The next bad news is the doctor tells you it is very advance and aggressive and there is little they can do to stop its growth. You now have a very short time to live and what is left will be very painful for you and your family. A simple change could have added years to your life, more time to be with your loved ones and them to be with you. A selfish act of enjoyment, something you could have changed to make life for you and those around you better and you refused to do it.
    You can make any decision you like, but is your decision based on facts, or because you donít like the people stating the facts. Do you choose to discount global warming because you find nothing to support it or because of your dislike of Al Gore and refusing to believe anything he says as Truth? If this is your way of rationalizing a problem, them Iím guessing you have made many errors in judgment in the past and will continue to make them in the future.
    As you can see, most here choose to pick the first option. Unfortunately, no amount of logic or evidence will get them to change their views. Anyway, good post.

  14. #13
    Senior Member Havasu1986's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Yorba Linda & Lake Havasu
    Posts
    6,120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ram78d10 View Post
    As you can see, most here choose to pick the first option. Unfortunately, no amount of logic or evidence will get them to change their views. Anyway, good post.
    Yeah..They worry more about the debt that their children or grandchildren may or may not inherit. But aren't concerned about anything else.

  15. #14
    Senior Member Uncle Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,989

    Default

    Not a believer in that man is affecting the climate much at all, but do believe in cycles.

    What you are witnessing is the creation of a new market here- without an EMERGENCY how do you force companies to pay trillions of dollars in fee, fines, redesigns, and on new regulation? - you cant. you NEED TO CREATE AN EMERGENCY.

    The Emergency is nothing more than marketing.

    Mr Gore although receiving little to no salary from his endeavors has huge interest in the form of ownership of stocks of companies vying for your clean energy money.


    The vostok ice core formations proved that co2 follows heat- not the other way around.

    In other word the heat/cold thing is a cycle powered by our sun.
    Are we helping- No

    Now- do I do what I can to conserve -yes
    Do I think energy efficiency is good business -yes,
    Am I a supporter of efficiency with my own dollars- yes.

    Is this a GLOBAL EMERGENCY- not at all.

    Creating an EMERGENCY out of this is charlatanism at is highest.

    Uncle Dave
    Last edited by Uncle Dave; 02-03-2011 at 04:35 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 4 11 ... LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

LinkBacks (?)

  1. 02-17-2011, 01:46 PM

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95