Remember when they said DADT wouldn't affect benefits?
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 14 of 121

Thread:
Remember when they said DADT wouldn't affect benefits?

  1. #1
    I'm baaaaack... hkunz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lake Havasu
    Posts
    4,365

    Default Remember when they said DADT wouldn't affect benefits?

    5 weeks after DADT was undone, the whackos are out trying to get the next step in the downgrade of the US Military. Sueing for full benefits to gay marriages, just like some had predicted. What's next? Polygamy? Bestiality? It's a slippery slope, and if you don't think so, it's probably because you are pushing us down it.

    Gay and lesbian servicemembers sue U.S.
    It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument. -William G. McAdoo, lawyer and politician (1863-1941)

    07 Advantage X-Flight 600 SCi Bravo 1 XR
    04 Cheetah Scorpion 6.2 Bravo 1 - SOLD!
    96 Donzi 21' 454 Bravo 3 Medallion - gone!
    72 Tahiti 16' 468 Olds Berkeley jet - SOLD!
    11 RZR XP, 08 Polaris Scrambler, 06 Rhino, 06 Joyner 650 dune buggy, 04 KFX 700

  2. Remove Advertisements
    PerformanceBoats.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Already miss the 310/562 2manymustangs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    13,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hkunz View Post
    5 weeks after DADT was undone, the whackos are out trying to get the next step in the downgrade of the US Military. Sueing for full benefits to gay marriages, just like some had predicted. What's next? Polygamy? Bestiality? It's a slippery slope, and if you don't think so, it's probably because you are pushing us down it.

    Gay and lesbian servicemembers sue U.S.
    Ugh... THis thing will NEVER end... They sure opened a can of worms...
    Pat Eason, the voice of reason...

  4. #3
    Purple headed member Quickjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Menifee
    Posts
    7,646

    Default

    Let them have benefits. Who cares? They are fighting for this Country and should have what anyone else with the courage to fight has. Non issue really........
    Quote Originally Posted by thatguy View Post
    I used to believe QJ was a gay black man..

    Quote Originally Posted by Havasu Secret View Post
    Keith...
    Real Fast Big Blocks are always V-Drives

  5. #4
    Senior Member EVILFORCE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    5,180

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickjet View Post
    Let them have benefits. Who cares? They are fighting for this Country and should have what anyone else with the courage to fight has. Non issue really........
    Whats up you OL Peter Puffer???

    I need that number we talked about. He is not answering the one I have.
    No Fool Like A Old Fool is there?

  6. #5
    Purple headed member Quickjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Menifee
    Posts
    7,646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EVILFORCE View Post
    Whats up you OL Peter Puffer???

    I need that number we talked about. He is not answering the one I have.
    Hold on, I'm having my way with the pool boy.....
    Quote Originally Posted by thatguy View Post
    I used to believe QJ was a gay black man..

    Quote Originally Posted by Havasu Secret View Post
    Keith...
    Real Fast Big Blocks are always V-Drives

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hkunz View Post
    5 weeks after DADT was undone, the whackos are out trying to get the next step in the downgrade of the US Military. Sueing for full benefits to gay marriages, just like some had predicted. What's next? Polygamy? Bestiality? It's a slippery slope, and if you don't think so, it's probably because you are pushing us down it.

    Gay and lesbian servicemembers sue U.S.

    Here is how I see it. A person is free to:
    Use their voice to say anyhing except yell "fire" in a theater or to conspire to incite harm.
    Use their mind to think any thoughts.
    Use their hands to do anything except do harm to others.
    Use their feet to walk anywhere except to trespass.
    Use their eyes to look anywhere in public.
    Use their ears to hear anything in public.
    So why can't adults be free to use their sexual parts with other adults as they choose?
    So why can't adults be free to marry other adults who they like for what ever reasons?
    It has no more affect on me than a person choosing a Ford or Chevy, A religion or political party!
    Give up morality control freaks! Let people be free!

  8. #7
    T&Y
    T&Y is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,028

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hkunz View Post
    5 weeks after DADT was undone, the whackos are out trying to get the next step in the downgrade of the US Military. Sueing for full benefits to gay marriages, just like some had predicted. What's next? Polygamy? Bestiality? It's a slippery slope, and if you don't think so, it's probably because you are pushing us down it.

    Gay and lesbian servicemembers sue U.S.
    \
    The private sector company I worked for as well as the police agency I work for both have had "significant other" insurance coverage for years. Benefits other than medical... not so much. Only a matter of time until the military adapts the same practice. This is really nothing new.
    Last edited by T&Y; 10-27-2011 at 08:44 PM.

  9. #8
    Purple headed member Quickjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Menifee
    Posts
    7,646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zombie View Post
    Here is how I see it. A person is free to:
    Use their voice to say anyhing except yell "fire" in a theater or to conspire to incite harm.
    Use their mind to think any thoughts.
    Use their hands to do anything except do harm to others.
    Use their feet to walk anywhere except to trespass.
    Use their eyes to look anywhere in public.
    Use their ears to hear anything in public.
    So why can't adults be free to use their sexual parts with other adults as they choose?
    So why can't adults be free to marry other adults who they like for what ever reasons?
    It has no more affect on me than a person choosing a Ford or Chevy, A religion or political party!
    Give up morality control freaks! Let people be free!
    For some reason our resident "Conservatives" don't coralate freedom with small government. Small Governemnt only matters when the almighty dollar is on the table. lStay out of my wallet but please come into my bedroom. That's the Christian way as we all know Jesus was a rich man who hated Homos.
    Last edited by Quickjet; 10-27-2011 at 10:18 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by thatguy View Post
    I used to believe QJ was a gay black man..

    Quote Originally Posted by Havasu Secret View Post
    Keith...
    Real Fast Big Blocks are always V-Drives

  10. #9
    Already miss the 310/562 2manymustangs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    13,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zombie View Post
    Here is how I see it. A person is free to:
    Use their voice to say anyhing except yell "fire" in a theater or to conspire to incite harm.
    Use their mind to think any thoughts.
    Use their hands to do anything except do harm to others.
    Use their feet to walk anywhere except to trespass.
    Use their eyes to look anywhere in public.
    Use their ears to hear anything in public.
    So why can't adults be free to use their sexual parts with other adults as they choose?
    So why can't adults be free to marry other adults who they like for what ever reasons?
    It has no more affect on me than a person choosing a Ford or Chevy, A religion or political party!
    Give up morality control freaks! Let people be free!

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickjet View Post
    For some reason our resident "Conservatives" don't coralate freedom with small government. Small Governemnt only matters when the almighty dollar is on the table. lStay out of my wallet but please come into my bedroom. That's the Christian way as we all know Jesus was a rich man who hated Homos.

    http://www.geneticsexualattraction.com/


    ^^^ No rules as long as you are a consenting adult and nobody is being hurt, right, thats what your saying??? ^^^

    You guys probably should rush over and create your account on THAT website... YOU FREAKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




    Quickjet, you really need to study the U.S. Constitution and try to understand what it says AND the spirit that it was crafted/framed in... I accept the fact that Zombonie and Rambonie will NEVER get it but I think you can/will...
    Last edited by 2manymustangs; 10-28-2011 at 05:54 AM.
    Pat Eason, the voice of reason...

  11. #10
    Purple headed member Quickjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Menifee
    Posts
    7,646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2manymustangs;


    [B
    Quickjet, you really need to study the U.S. Constitution and try to understand what it says AND the spirit that it was crafted/framed in... I accept the fact that Zombonie and Rambonie will NEVER get it but I think you can/will...[/B]
    I do get it....you complain about regulation yet want to regulate what consenting adults want to do in the privacy of their own homes (or hotel room). Regulate people just not the money they make right? What if they had a Homo tax? Would that make you feel better.
    Besides, it's none of your business what others do so quit trying to oppress them.
    Quote Originally Posted by thatguy View Post
    I used to believe QJ was a gay black man..

    Quote Originally Posted by Havasu Secret View Post
    Keith...
    Real Fast Big Blocks are always V-Drives

  12. #11
    Just Me snoc653's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Eastern Iowa
    Posts
    4,047

    Default

    By definition, a society has to do with the group living within the beliefs and rules of the group and not the explicit desires of the individual. The vast majority of our country does not believe in nor condone homosexual marriages. If people want to form their own society where that is allowed, go for it. The opperative word is GO.

    And while I don't have to agree with someone's beliefs to be tollerant of them, I certainly don't have to agree to subsidise thier life style with my tax dollars. Civil Unions, an appropriate term for it, are a personal prefrence. Mairrage is a biblical term used to define a civil union with specific Religion based social expectations. People trying to force others to accept homosexuality by government edict is wrong in my personal oppinion. A civil union can be two people who chose to live together for whatever reason and there is no explicit expectation for sexual contact, where as a Marriage by biblical terms does require consumating the marriage with a sexual act. If they aren't trying to polarize society and force us to accept their view (which I see as perverted), then why do they need to call it a marriage? And why should we be forced to subsidize thier perversion when clearly the vast majority of scociety disagrees with it?
    So many projects, so little time

  13. #12
    Just Me snoc653's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Eastern Iowa
    Posts
    4,047

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickjet View Post
    What if they had a Homo tax? Would that make you feel better.
    I think that tax would be illegal, because wouldn't that be considierd a pole tax?
    So many projects, so little time

  14. #13
    Already miss the 310/562 2manymustangs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    13,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickjet View Post
    I do get it....you complain about regulation yet want to regulate what consenting adults want to do in the privacy of their own homes (or hotel room). Regulate people just not the money they make right? What if they had a Homo tax? Would that make you feel better.
    Besides, it's none of your business what others do so quit trying to oppress them.
    SO, just to be clear you and Zombonie are OK with the lifestyle described in the link I provided???


    You two are further out there than I thought...
    Pat Eason, the voice of reason...

  15. #14
    Senior Member EVILFORCE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    5,180

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quickjet View Post
    I do get it....you complain about regulation yet want to regulate what consenting adults want to do in the privacy of their own homes (or hotel room). Regulate people just not the money they make right? What if they had a Homo tax? Would that make you feel better.
    Besides, it's none of your business what others do so quit trying to oppress them.


    I say BURN THEM AT THE STAKE.
    No Fool Like A Old Fool is there?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Tags for this Thread

Digg This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95