1 - 10 of 10 Posts

396_Ways_To_Spit

·
B.A.M aka "Black Azz Mike
Joined
·
2,925 Posts
Discussion Starter
Look at this chart. Why does the torque fall way off and the hp keeps climbing????

71hallett

·
Cantard
Joined
·
5,017 Posts
Because it needs more plunum volume and or more carb.

cfm

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,263 Posts
Hp is a function of torque and rpm.
HP= (tq x rpm) /5252
So, if tq falls less than rpm raises the hp raises. IE: More work is being done ! Force=torque and work done=hp

Budweiser

·
Or Seth, either one
Joined
·
3,270 Posts
Hp is a function of torque and rpm.
HP= (tq x rpm) /5252
So, if tq falls less than rpm raises the hp raises. IE: More work is being done ! Force=torque and work done=hp
Exactly, the question has nothing to do with the cam.

Another way to look at it is: Torque is what a Dyno measures, It then uses the equation above ( (tq x rpm) /5252 = HP ) to calculate the work being done AKA Horsepower.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower
http://www.howstuffworks.com/horsepower.htm

Sleeper CP

·
Resident Ford Nut
Joined
·
10,075 Posts
Look at this chart. Why does the torque fall way off and the hp keeps climbing????
QUOTE]

Just curious, why do you ask ? Do you think the trq should not drop off ?

Using the equation posted above; if thatsame engine could some how produce the max trq # of 790 lbs ft at 8,000 rpm's it would be making 1,203hp.

It's just a function of engine dynamics.

Sleeper CP

396_Ways_To_Spit

·
B.A.M aka "Black Azz Mike
Joined
·
2,925 Posts
Discussion Starter
I was just curious because the motors that Chris Straub has designed cams for never lookd like that...................

IMPATIENT 1

·
mo balls than \$cents\$
Joined
·
11,734 Posts
looks like a nice curve to me, look how long it holds max torque throwout the rangedevil

Sleeper CP

·
Resident Ford Nut
Joined
·
10,075 Posts
I was just curious because the motors that Chris Straub has designed cams for never lookd like that...................
I've had cam's done that have falling off the edge of the earth 200 rpm's beyound called for max hp rpm. One lost 28 hp and two other's 16 -18.(I'm assuming that's what you mean or do Chris's cam's hold trq longer) The RM 565 cam is a drag car engine designed to rev to 8,000 rpm not a jet boat or even a v-drive for that matter.

The current cam in my 565 hold's it's trq along way like that one, but not to 8,000 rpm's it's a matter of the cam, head's and intake working together:

That's over 700 lbs ft from 4,800-7,000

Sleeper CP

cfm

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,263 Posts
I was just curious because the motors that Chris Straub has designed cams for never lookd like that...................
#1 - most engines you'll see on the board will have dyno sheets showing say from 3k-6k or so. The chart above is 5500 -8k.

Don't let graph's fool your thinking unless you are using same exact data points. Then, overlay the graphs when comparing motors, especially similar build motors. Some intersting stuff comes out. A 'wide flat' torque isn't always what it seems to be. Sometimes it is. Looking at one graph and relying on memory for the next doesn't work too well. Been there, done that !

·