That is some seriously funny shit. I wonder if that idiot has changed his appearance and moved several times trying to live that video down. Yes the sky is falling isn't a new problem. Yes there are things we should be concerned with. No we shouldn't panic and muster the forces to start a revolution.
It appears to be from around 1993 or 1994 leading up to the first assault weapon ban. Not sure where this was, but obviously none of what he had to say turned out to have any truth to it. :duh:Where was this guy talking and to whom? Do you know? Also, do you know where and when this was filmed? Pretty strange stuff, and scary too...
Not yet!!!!!!!!It appears to be from around 1993 or 1994 leading up to the first assault weapon ban. Not sure where this was, but obviously none of what he had to say turned out to have any truth to it. :duh:
Sorry. Yes it was pure sarcasim. A U.S. prsident, and son in one of the richest most powerfull families in the U.S says we have a problem, then bet your ass we have a problem. When the POTUS ends up dead, supposedly at the hands of some nobody with a 50 year old rifle, who then ends up dead the next day, you should start thinking we have a problem.What is it I'm missing with responses of JFK being a wacko, is that sarcasim? The intel guy in the first video and JBS in the second have astounding forsight for what is being voted on now with the UN ATT (Arms Trade Treaty). Yes folks a revolution is coming and it's time for our fat lazy asses, yes you and me to know how to make fire, purify water and build shelter. If your a liberal and are still on cloud 9, good you can be my bullet sponge. :bangmyhead:
So you think he was making a future prediction. and the plan has been on hold to the last 20 years? You think the guy knew what he was talking about and the government had organized and trained all the gangs in the early 90s and did what? Put them on hold? How many right wing people have been either governor, congressman, senator, or even president since then? And no public mention of this concocted conspiracy rhetoric. How do you explain that? Some people will accept anything as truth if it is what they want to hear.Not yet!!!!!!!!
What the fuck does the date have to do with anything? It still rings true. You are blind. Truth, you don't know the truth nor do you accept the truth.
FUCK theunited nations.
I think there may be an answer to what you are implying.So you think he was making a future prediction. and the plan has been on hold to the last 20 years? You think the guy knew what he was talking about and the government had organized and trained all the gangs in the early 90s and did what? Put them on hold? How many right wing people have been either governor, congressman, senator, or even president since then? And no public mention of this concocted conspiracy rhetoric. How do you explain that? Some people will accept anything as truth if it is what they want to hear.
But to answer your question; the date has everything to do with it. If it wasn't true 20 years ago and we are hearing the same things again, it would cause a prudent person to really examine the "facts" allegedly being cited today that make the same claims as the 20 year old lies.
Supreme Court Justice.What is a SCJ?
Yes every idea should be checked out, regardless of how improbable it may seem. The person in the video clearly had a reason for stating the things he did in the manner that he did. I think he was trying to alarm the people and motivate them in a specific direction, though the use of false statements and the resulting fear. From what he was presenting one would think that the intel agencies were all dialed in to our country. That simply wasn't the case at the time of that speech. There is definitely a driving force that is trying to change the world. That force is greed, it's not new and the worship of money is the dominating cultural difference in that NWO. There are two basic paths to the NWO I just described. There is a path to money from the right, and a path from the left. Personally, I don't care for either path. Neither side is doing what they are for the "betterment of mankind". They are doing it for their own advancement, period. I personally wish both sides would stop trying to tell me it has to be either all right or all left. There is a middle ground and while it is a lot of work to stay in the middle, like most things it is where the truth lays.I think there may be an answer to what you are implying.
As I read it, what you are saying is that the NWO or whatever you want to call it is a "myth" of sorts since there has been no solid revelation of its existence?
That is mainly a product of interpretation, in many ways.
As an agent involved in intelligence field, you certainly know that any peice of data can be construed 100 different ways. Some more likely, some less likely.
You also know that the less likely scenarios can not be discounted. Pearl Harbor comes to mind.
There is a MAJOR difference in this Country between now and the eras of FDR and even JFK.
We as a Nation have lost our last line of defense from a NWO/ Bilderbergs/ or any other name for it.
The ONE thing that has been insurmountable, the ONE thing that has prevented the implementing ( and even the exposure) of such a structure.
Above ALL other things, what the O admin has accomplished towards this end is the destruction of this last line of defense.
And that is the removal of "The will of the people".
Give him ONE more SCJ and watch what happens.
You want hard evidence?
I believe you'll have all you need at that point.
I'm not sure why I even bother but again, show me where I said just because the SC hasn't ruled on something it is considered legal? Regardless, just because something is legal doesn't make it right. And there is a huge difference between thinking someone hasn't done anything wrong and thinking they can do no wrong. Just like there is an even larger difference in a military which has obeyed the orders of the person acting as the CIC and thinking they will therefore obey unconstitutional or unlawful orders.Supreme Court Justice.
Keep in mind that this one person and the courts is all Hitler needed to make every order he gave perfectly legal.
snoc has already gone on record as saying that if the POTUS/CIC orders it, and the courts approve it, or just remain silent, then its legal. At that point Constitutiona; LAW is meaningless. I assume that includes orders given to the military, and carried out by the very people that are sworn to uphold constitutional LAW.
At one time we had a legal system AND MORE IMPORTANTLY A MEDIA, that thought otherwise, regardless what the CIC thought. There was a time when people didn't believe everything the CIC did was legal. NOW, we have morons that believe otherwise, and there is a very very very very good chance that morons wearing uniforms will MURDER Americans because the CIC ORDERS IT!
UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE!!!! BUT VERY VERY TRUE.
Nixon - When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal - YouTube