Performance Boats Forum banner

1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Colts fan & Stoker owner
Joined
·
8,170 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Not sure if this has been posted.

If a $16 trillion debt wasn't enough for taxpayers to lose sleep over, the Obama administration has offered to pick up the check -- at taxpayer expense -- for legal costs associated with defense industry layoffs should automatic Pentagon cuts be triggered.
Republicans are now crying foul over the move, accusing the White House of playing politics over the possibility of mass layoffs. At issue are the crush of Pentagon budget cuts set to go into effect starting in January should Congress fail to avert them. Under federal law, many employers are supposed to give 60-day notice of "mass layoffs" if they are considered likely, but the Obama administration for months now has urged companies not to do so.
Last week, the administration doubled down on that plea by offering to cover legal fees in compensation challenges.
Rep. Buck McKeon, R-Calif., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said the notice amounted to a "threat" to contractors.
"It appears companies will bow to the threat implicit in last week's OMB guidance; withhold notices today or the government might not cover your court costs down the road," he said.
Further, McKeon warned that the administration was using tax dollars to win over companies to follow the "dubious" and "politically motivated" guidance to ignore the federal law known as the WARN Act.
"Even though the (White House budget office) directive purports to protect the defense industry against the costs of not complying with the WARN Act, they cannot guarantee how the courts would rule in such an action. Thus the president has pledged to compound the impact of sequestration by dedicating already scarce resources to cover needless court costs," McKeon said.
Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., also said it was "troubling that the Obama administration would openly encourage the violation of federal law and offer to pay the legal fees that resulted."
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., claimed Obama was trying to prevent layoff notices from hitting mailboxes "right before the election."
"This is typical Barack Obama politics -- being supportive of the WARN Act when convenient and against it when it creates political downside," Graham said. "This is the most outcome-based White House in memory."
Lockheed Martin has reportedly already backed off threats to issue thousands of layoff warnings ahead of the election, in response to the administration's latest assurances and guidance.
The offer to pay the legal fees was included in a memorandum issued by the administration Friday that also restated the Labor Department's position from July that contractors should not issue written notices to employees because of the "uncertainty" over the across-the-board cuts to the defense budget and other federal spending that will occur Jan. 2 unless Congress reaches a new deal.
The notices are required under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act and generally require employers with more than 100 employees to provide 60-day notices of "mass layoffs if they are reasonably foreseeable."
The projected $500 billion in Pentagon cuts under the so-called sequestration will occur because Congress failed to agree on a deficit-reduction plan in the wake of the deal last summer to raise the debt ceiling.
The guidance issued by the Labor Department this summer stated "it is neither necessary nor appropriate" for federal contractors to issue the warnings.
The latest memorandum states the federal government would cover employee compensation under the WARN Act -- "irrespective of the outcome" as long as the contractor follows the Labor Department guidelines.


Read more: Republicans rip White House for putting tax dollars on line over possible defense layoffs | Fox News
 

·
Member
Joined
·
1,512 Posts
It's been all over the news. Question is what's Congress going to do about it? Where do you go when an administration is so corrupt and holds all the cards? This election is pivotal.
 

·
"I'm just SPRAYIN' man!!"
Joined
·
618 Posts
I've been working for the defense industry in one way or another for my entire adult life (28 years) and to read that the Obama administration is messing with my job just pisses me off to no end! :)bit
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
25,975 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,449 Posts
I hope we can capture the Senate in these elections. The Congress could, at least, impeach Hussein. The most corrupt, law breaking, inept, president I have ever seen. Can a president be brought to court for corruption charges, after he loses the election?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
25,975 Posts
I hope we can capture the Senate in these elections. The Congress could, at least, impeach Hussein. The most corrupt, law breaking, inept, president I have ever seen. Can a president be brought to court for corruption charges, after he loses the election?
Probably could , but doubt any sitting POTUS would ever allow it. They see it as "too destructive" to the country. I know one thing. Send one to Leavenworth for 2025 and see if there isn't some changes in DC. I truely believe alittle jail time for a POTUS and some congress members would shake a few things up. Very first thing that should be done is the military leveling of K street. Not even all that sure they should even bother evacuating the place.

I take it you all are aware that the House Ethics Committee found no wrong doing in Maxine Waters funneling tax payer bailout money to her husbands bank. Way too much back scratching going on in Washington, specially with the "old guard" that tends to sit on these "committees".



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,449 Posts
Probably could , but doubt any sitting POTUS would ever allow it. They see it as "too destructive" to the country. I know one thing. Send one to Leavenworth for 2025 and see if there isn't some changes in DC. I truely believe alittle jail time for a POTUS and some congress members would shake a few things up. Very first thing that should be done is the military leveling of K street. Not even all that sure they should even bother evacuating the place.
Yeah, I like that idea!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,020 Posts
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., claimed Obama was trying to prevent layoff notices from hitting mailboxes "right before the election."
"This is typical Barack Obama politics --[/url]

Yep, another day, another outrage.
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top