Joined
·
2,637 Posts
The pickup will be the same regardless, I think. I don't use very many standard volume pumps, but I think the pickup location is the same on big block Chevy pumps, unlike the small blocks that have some different size pickup tubes.So you have a couple you know for sure are Mellings with out the 77HV cast into the housing? I would like to figure out what it is to get the correct pickup for the new pan. Guess I can change the pump too. I kinda hate to. It held good oil pressure last summer.
The pickup will be the same regardless, I think. I don't use very many standard volume pumps, but I think the pickup location is the same on big block Chevy pumps, unlike the small blocks that have some different size pickup tubes.
Some pumps have M77 cast into them, but not all of them.Thanks Barry. Looking at Rex's B&B pan thread there are a few different pickups depending on which pump is used. That is Gen IV stuff though. Jeg's tech said the same thing about my Gen 6 via chat. I am not clear what the difference is between the pickups.
I agree Tom. Most of the pickups you get from auto parts stores are either Mellings, or clones of the Mellings pickups.Matt it looks like that Pickup made have been produced or modified from an aftermarket replacement (Napa etc)
Bob we utilize these (Napa) over some that are offered in the after mkt due to general design and shape , personally dont care for the little rectangular "jobbies" and if correct for the pan depth these work well , I think the original app that works with jet pans was some BBC Corvette and Chevelles (7 7/8 +or- pan depth) TomI agree Tom. Most of the pickups you get from auto parts stores are either Mellings, or clones of the Mellings pickups.
Another view of the Mellings 305s pickup.
![]()
Tom, the reason for requesting a picture is that some windage trays will accept a rectangular pick-up and some will accept both. On a BBC with a standard depth pan I like the s-77 pick-up which is windowed and not an open 360 degree screen. But again it depends on the windage tray used.Bob we utilize these (Napa) over some that are offered in the after mkt due to general design and shape , personally dont care for the little rectangular "jobbies" and if correct for the pan depth these work well , I think the original app that works with jet pans was some BBC Corvette and Chevelles (7 7/8 +or- pan depth) Tom
:thumb:Tom, the reason for requesting a picture is that some windage trays will accept a rectangular pick-up and some will accept both. On a BBC with a standard depth pan I like the s-77 pick-up which is windowed and not an open 360 degree screen. But again it depends on the windage tray used.
I agree That design will actually increase oil flow into the pump. But the reason I asked to see the pan and windage tray was to see if he is using a rectangular pick-up to clear the windage tray.:thumb:
The S77 pickup is very similar to the OEM GM pickup and its an excellent design. You do need to be a little more carefull about the distance from the bottom, but no more than most piCkups. It does require a little more room in the pan than some designs, and it may interfere with the swing gates in some pans. But it is an excellent pickup.
Lot of people think the window restricts oil flow. IT DOESN'T!
![]()
Matt your current pan looks to be a "sectioned" OEM pan someone added to the sump area regarding the rust , some elbow grease and some Naval Jelly , CRL or even Chrome wheel cleaner will knock that down , regarding the "Jegs" pan hopefully the pan depth doesnt exceed 7 3/4 to maybe 8" ?Here is the pan that this pickup was being used with. The pickup is open on the bottom with just the screen. It held great oil pressure last season. It is a bone stock Gen 6 454. I found some rust and pitting on the outside of the pan that I do not like while I had the motor out. If it was not for this rust I would not be changing it. I hesitate to even post my choice on the new pan. There are a lot of opinions on anything to do with oil or oiling systems. Again, according to the PO (with a receipt showing the same) this is a bone stock remain 454 purchased from Indmar about 10 years ago. I plan to use the Jegs branded 11 qt pan.
Thanks Tom. The pitting is deeper than that. I could clean it up but I would never trust it. The pitting is pretty substantial in a couple of places. The pictures do not do justice to the damage. The Jegs pan is 8" deep. Mine existing pan is 7 7/8" I am pretty confident it will clear.Matt your current pan looks to be a "sectioned" OEM pan someone added to the sump area regarding the rust , some elbow grease and some Naval Jelly , CRL or even Chrome wheel cleaner will knock that down , regarding the "Jegs" pan hopefully the pan depth doesnt exceed 7 3/4 to maybe 8" ?
Eight inches can be edgy depending on engine mounting , engine position etc n we counterbore intakes to reduce the height of the intake screws (to gain clearance)Thanks Tom. The pitting is deeper than that. I could clean it up but I would never trust it. The pitting is pretty substantial in a couple of places. The pictures do not do justice to the damage. The Jegs pan is 8" deep. Mine existing pan is 7 7/8" I am pretty confident it will clear.