Performance Boats Forum banner

1 - 20 of 58 Posts

·
Red Blooded American
Joined
·
15,853 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Obama's foreign policy failed so miserably that his ratings are showing more losses every day so he's got to wag the dog to keep folks from discussing another minute about Libya, the lies, the deceptions, the mis-directions and the verifiable inaccuracies that were reported for weeks as four brave men died in another terrorist attack that this administration refused to recognize as a terrorist attack until the last debate when he was called on it in front of the world. Even Candy Olbermann couldn't cover that one.

Since there is no way out of that mess approaching a foreign-policy debate that will be impossible to cover up, he's decided to announce talks with Iran about Nuclear capabilities as if the past three and a half years, this wasn't a giant problem. How sad this administration's lack of leadership has proven to be for America.

NYT: Iran, US agree to one-on-one nuclear talks - World news - The New York Times | NBC News
 

·
steelcomp was here
Joined
·
26,515 Posts
Obama's foreign policy failed so miserably that his ratings are showing more losses every day so he's got to wag the dog to keep folks from discussing another minute about Libya, the lies, the deceptions, the mis-directions and the verifiable inaccuracies that were reported for weeks as four brave men died in another terrorist attack that this administration refused to recognize as a terrorist attack until the last debate when he was called on it in front of the world. Even Candy Olbermann couldn't cover that one.

Since there is no way out of that mess approaching a foreign-policy debate that will be impossible to cover up, he's decided to announce talks with Iran about Nuclear capabilities as if the past three and a half years, this wasn't a giant problem. How sad this administration's lack of leadership has proven to be for America.

NYT: Iran, US agree to one-on-one nuclear talks - World news - The New York Times | NBC News
So US/Iran nuclear talks are a bad thing?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,729 Posts
So US/Iran nuclear talks are a bad thing?
I don't think so. I never subscribed to the idea that having talks with your "enemy" shows weakness. You know the best way to destroy an enemy? Make him your friend. Now I'm not saying we need to become friends with Iran, but it's not in either of our interests to engage in a shooting war. I've read something that said Hezbollah has a lot of undercover people here in the US, that the US government knows this, and that they would probably do things if we ever strike Iran. Anyway, I don't see the harm in sitting down with Iran and trying to come to an agreement that both countries can live with.

When I first read about this, and from what I understand there is no meeting planned, just dialogue about a meeting, Iran requested the meeting specifically after the election. I think they might be worried what Romney might do if he wins. They might be motivated to reach some agreement before he would actually take office. I read Obama didn't want to strike until after the election. Anyway, it would be smart on their part to wait until after the election so they know whom they will be dealing with.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,688 Posts
This is a trial balloon to see what the reaction well be ,and if it could possible help Obama get re elected.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
25,975 Posts
So US/Iran nuclear talks are a bad thing?
They can be if they are nothing more than a stall tactic.
Have we, or anybody else ever once talked any country out of developing a nuke? Have we or anybody else ever "physically" stopped a coutry from developing a nuke that was in fact actually developing one?

Maybe, just maybe, Isreal did with the bombing of Iraq's facitility back in '81. Maybe.
Gut feeling on this is that if Iraq has intentions of developing a nike, history had shown we won't talk them out of it, and we would take physical action agaisnt them. But thats not to say the program won't see one big ass bump in the path. But I doubt we will be the one to cause it.

If "somebody else" stops the progress, batton down the hatches because I think it could get ugly rather quickly.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
 

·
Red Blooded American
Joined
·
15,853 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
So US/Iran nuclear talks are a bad thing?
When they are only for a diversion from the disaster in Libya, yes. This issue should have been addressed the day he took office instead of sealing his records as the problem has been a major concern throughout this administration's entire term. The fact that he's addressing it now is solely to divert the American voters away from being impeached over the deaths of 4 Americans in Libya where security was loosened rather than increased by this administration.

Kinda like your attempt to discredit Romney by posting up info from the Salt Lake Tribune and calling it a Mormon Newspaper? About as effective as a Chick-fil-A boycott, that turned out to be, but we understand your motivation and sympathize.:bangmyhead:
 

·
steelcomp was here
Joined
·
26,515 Posts
They can be if they are nothing more than a stall tactic.
Have we, or anybody else ever once talked any country out of developing a nuke? Have we or anybody else ever "physically" stopped a coutry from developing a nuke that was in fact actually developing one?

Maybe, just maybe, Isreal did with the bombing of Iraq's facitility back in '81. Maybe.
Gut feeling on this is that if Iraq has intentions of developing a nike, history had shown we won't talk them out of it, and we would take physical action agaisnt them. But thats not to say the program won't see one big ass bump in the path. But I doubt we will be the one to cause it.

If "somebody else" stops the progress, batton down the hatches because I think it could get ugly rather quickly.
I was asking Doc. ;)
 

·
steelcomp was here
Joined
·
26,515 Posts
When they are only for a diversion from the disaster in Libya, yes. This issue should have been addressed the day he took office instead of sealing his records as the problem has been a major concern throughout this administration's entire term. The fact that he's addressing it now is solely to divert the American voters away from being impeached over the deaths of 4 Americans in Libya where security was loosened rather than increased by this administration.

Kinda like your attempt to discredit Romney by posting up info from the Salt Lake Tribune and calling it a Mormon Newspaper? About as effective as a Chick-fil-A boycott, that turned out to be, but we understand your motivation and sympathize.:bangmyhead:
It wasn't an attempt to discredit Romney, Doc, I thought it was just interesting that the biggest paper in Utah was endorsing Obama for the second time, in spite of all Romney's Heavenly perfection. I was just interested in hearing some views on the subject. I don't see how that was discrediting Romney.If nothing else, it gave you an opportunity to make some more really lame excuses.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,426 Posts
This is a trial balloon to see what the reaction well be ,and if it could possible help Obama get re elected.
I agree it's a stink bomb they're floating for some affect. The article is a lot of words saying a whole lot of nothing, unnamed people talking in circles. If in fact Iran does want to have a chat, It will be with Romney. They have no respect and no fear of the eunuch in the WH.

But if they do want to talk, I'm sure it's because they see a changing of the guard in the WH from a Wimp to a person that will be more apt to shoot a minute man up their ass just to get their attention. I'm sure we all see the resemblance to the last crisis with Iran and a pussy leaving the WH, they may actually want a pow wow.
 

·
steelcomp was here
Joined
·
26,515 Posts
Yeah Bob. This wasn't an attempt to find truth, it was an attempt to discredit and you ruined it - now STOP IT, WOULD YOU! hil:) hil:)
Ruined it? LOL...grow up you juvinile nutswinger. I swear, I've never in my life heard someone so blinded on a candidate. Next thing you'll be telling us that Rom's election is "divine internvention". What does your "living prophet" Monson say? Maybe he'll appoint Romney some sort of diety status? hil:)
 

·
steelcomp was here
Joined
·
26,515 Posts
This is a trial balloon to see what the reaction well be ,and if it could possible help Obama get re elected.
No doubt about that. I'll believe actual "talks" are taking place when I see it.
 

·
steelcomp was here
Joined
·
26,515 Posts
I agree it's a stink bomb they're floating for some affect. The article is a lot of words saying a whole lot of nothing, unnamed people talking in circles. If in fact Iran does want to have a chat, It will be with Romney. They have no respect and no fear of the eunuch in the WH.

But if they do want to talk, I'm sure it's because they see a changing of the guard in the WH from a Wimp to a person that will be more apt to shoot a minute man up their ass just to get their attention. I'm sure we all see the resemblance to the last crisis with Iran and a pussy leaving the WH, they may actually want a pow wow.
I'll believe that when I see it.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,729 Posts
I agree it's a stink bomb they're floating for some affect. The article is a lot of words saying a whole lot of nothing, unnamed people talking in circles. If in fact Iran does want to have a chat, It will be with Romney. They have no respect and no fear of the eunuch in the WH.

But if they do want to talk, I'm sure it's because they see a changing of the guard in the WH from a Wimp to a person that will be more apt to shoot a minute man up their ass just to get their attention. I'm sure we all see the resemblance to the last crisis with Iran and a pussy leaving the WH, they may actually want a pow wow.
Where do you get this wimp shit? Obama drastically increased UAV strikes on suspected terrorists, he ordered the bin Laden raid, he helped in the downfall of qadafi, who has a history of supporting terrorism. What more should he have done, invaded Iran and Pakistan? I really doubt anyone is going to be shooting off any minutemans. And that would definately lower our standing in the eyes of the world.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,426 Posts
Where do you get this wimp shit? Obama drastically increased UAV strikes on suspected terrorists, he ordered the bin Laden raid, he helped in the downfall of qadafi, who has a history of supporting terrorism. What more should he have done, invaded Iran and Pakistan? I really doubt anyone is going to be shooting off any minutemans. And that would definately lower our standing in the eyes of the world.
You're absolutely right, my bad. If you're one of his Muzzy buddies, he'll more than likely chip you of a billion or so of our tax payer dollars to fund your next overthrow. If you're not one of his buddies and happen to be on his personal hit list, he'll man up and fly a drone over and assassinate your ass. As far as ordering the strike on Bin laden, did he do that on his Get Smart 9 iron or his Rodney Dangerfield 3 wood?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,119 Posts
well i guess joe biden was lying repeatedly about nothin' to see there in the last debate,eh? pretty sure iran would be happy to have obama remain iun office. talk is cheap.
 

·
Marine Organism
Joined
·
12,743 Posts
More smoke and mirrors. "Hey, look over here!"

Wimp... yes, his apology tours really have made him look strong... :)sphss
 

·
83 Crusader - 468 BBC
Joined
·
2,525 Posts
How can you negotiate with "people" whose beliefs are so intrenched in their radical Muslim faith, where as a follower, your #1 objective is to be the ONE & ONLY world's dominating religion, and as a radical Muslim you will do anything by whatever means available to make this objective reality. WE ARE THEIR ENEMY! Anyone who exercises suicide bombings will have no problem looking you in the eye and telling you whatever it takes to force you to lay down your arms, OR buy enough time to complete their plans in obtaining nukes. :bangmyhead:

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said:
We see today that there is a growing understanding in the international community that the extremist regime in Tehran is not just Israel's problem, but rather an issue that the entire international community must grapple with.

Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury.
Maybe it's time for a beer summit! :happy:
 
1 - 20 of 58 Posts
Top