Performance Boats Forum banner

1 - 18 of 18 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,008 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
"Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?" she said, making chopping motions with her hands for emphasis.

Followed with:

Look I already told all you assholes, we told those pieces of shit to just lay down and die and they did. What difference does it make? I'm your queen Damn it!:)sphss
 

·
Bah...
Joined
·
2,546 Posts
I've been following it a little bit today. I've had zilch for faith in this administration from the start, democrats and republicans alike, or whatever the hell they are. Pathetic. As barbaric as it may be until some sort of example such as the military hauling those responsible for actions out for a public execution for treason, this sort of behavior will continue until we implode internally or an outside force comes along. This country is too seeded with apathy, laziness and complacency otherwise for anything to happen. :no:
 

·
Already miss the 310/562
Joined
·
13,551 Posts
I say we all cash in our chips, pool our resoureces and buy a small catfish lake in Arkansas hills somewhere... :)

Lets all leave this RATRACE behind...

My workers in Guadalajara have 5x the quality of life I do making peanuts... It's already 100% shit there, so they dont worry about it... :D
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,397 Posts
First, understand that in the 2008 election, I thought everyone who ran was basically interested in doing right for this country....EXCEPT for Hillary....Can't stand her! But here is my question; What exactly is the reasoning behind the supposed "conspiracy" that this admin perpetrated on us? How is ASSURING someone is murdered by terrorists going to further the interests of this admin? I can see it hurting this admin', but I can't see it helping in any way.....
 

·
Living in a cage of fear
Joined
·
16,462 Posts
First, understand that in the 2008 election, I thought everyone who ran was basically interested in doing right for this country....EXCEPT for Hillary....Can't stand her! But here is my question; What exactly is the reasoning behind the supposed "conspiracy" that this admin perpetrated on us? How is ASSURING someone is murdered by terrorists going to further the interests of this admin? I can see it hurting this admin', but I can't see it helping in any way.....
It was pre-election.

Now it's just covering the tracks.

Try to keep up CVX!:duh::)bulb
 

·
Red Blooded American
Joined
·
15,853 Posts
First, understand that in the 2008 election, I thought everyone who ran was basically interested in doing right for this country....EXCEPT for Hillary....Can't stand her! But here is my question; What exactly is the reasoning behind the supposed "conspiracy" that this admin perpetrated on us? How is ASSURING someone is murdered by terrorists going to further the interests of this admin? I can see it hurting this admin', but I can't see it helping in any way.....
I love it! Here we have Mr. liberal who applauded Nixon being run out of town for lying about a phone tap but who doesn't understand how lying about the slaughter of brave Americans to cover their sorry behinds for ignoring their cries for help is wrong? Simply priceless!

Hillary with blood.jpg
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,810 Posts
First, understand that in the 2008 election, I thought everyone who ran was basically interested in doing right for this country....EXCEPT for Hillary....Can't stand her! But here is my question; What exactly is the reasoning behind the supposed "conspiracy" that this admin perpetrated on us? How is ASSURING someone is murdered by terrorists going to further the interests of this admin? I can see it hurting this admin', but I can't see it helping in any way.....

The only conspiracy in my mind is the coverup.

Here's what I want to know as an American citizen. Did the administration make the decision to not have the Marines guarding the area because they did not want American soldiers there for political reasons? If so (which was said by one of the generals), it shows how inept as a CIC he is.
I also want to know why they lied about what happened (yes, it was a lie orchestrated from the top by the administration). Was it to save his ass before the election? Probably.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,008 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
First, understand that in the 2008 election, I thought everyone who ran was basically interested in doing right for this country....EXCEPT for Hillary....Can't stand her! But here is my question; What exactly is the reasoning behind the supposed "conspiracy" that this admin perpetrated on us? How is ASSURING someone is murdered by terrorists going to further the interests of this admin? I can see it hurting this admin', but I can't see it helping in any way.....
They're covering up the fact that they armed Al Qaida in Libya who then were funneling arms to Syria.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,008 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
Cmon now Brad, what difference does it really make??? :rolleyes:
Did you see where that stupid cunt said we couldn't afford more security for the embassy?


Doesn't make a difference at all does it?:bangmyhead::)sphss
 

·
Member
Joined
·
1,512 Posts
Did you see where that stupid cunt said we couldn't afford more security for the embassy?


Doesn't make a difference at all does it?:bangmyhead::)sphss
She's trying to cover her ass for the Civil Suit that will come.
 

·
Already miss the 310/562
Joined
·
13,551 Posts
She's trying to cover her ass for the Civil Suit that will come.
Can they go for a civil judgment agaisnt their personal assets? I sure hope they can soke the KLINTOONs for every penny they have swindled over the last 30 years...
 

·
Member
Joined
·
1,512 Posts
This is the United States of Litigation. Of course they can go after her assets. She was negligent wasn't she. She was Chris Steven's boss. That negligence lead to the death of 4 innocent people? She doesn't want Rand Paul type going after her for Criminal negligence. If they can prove she was aware and took no action that a reasonable person would have in the same situation, she is negligent. It's pretty much like Chinese bombers heading toward San Francisco and the President saying lets wait and see if anyone dies before we act.

The real story surfaced yesterday. The US was taking arms out of Libya and sending them to the Syrian rebels. All along the CIA guys were saying they were trying account for all the shoulder fired missiles floating around Libya. I wonder how much of this was known by Congress?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,020 Posts
? How is ASSURING someone is murdered by terrorists going to further the interests of this admin? I can see it hurting this admin', but I can't see it helping in any way.....
Hmm. There were attacks in the 90s too. And Prez Clinton ordered a violent response. Why was there no response in Libya? Obama won't say.

The only conspiracy in my mind is the coverup.

Here's what I want to know as an American citizen. Did the administration make the decision to not have the Marines guarding the area because they did not want American soldiers there for political reasons? If so (which was said by one of the generals), it shows how inept as a CIC he is.
I also want to know why they lied about what happened (yes, it was a lie orchestrated from the top by the administration). Was it to save his ass before the election? Probably.
Thank you.
I'm not happy about being continually lied to, and this goes beyond right and left.
At another level this is a facet of monumental failure in Africa from O who was supposed to be an expert. You thought (subs) Africa looked bad 2 yrs. ago with millions murdered? Now add N. Africa; Egypt, Libya, Mali, Algeria.
 

·
Already miss the 310/562
Joined
·
13,551 Posts
Hmm. There were attacks in the 90s too. And Prez Clinton ordered a violent response. Why was there no response in Libya? Obama won't say.
You got my back bro? I got yo back bro... Aiiit....

It's all about the community organizing... :D
 

·
Just Me
Joined
·
4,056 Posts
Should be a open and shut case. She already claimed full responsibility.
Nothing is ever an open and shut case with the Clintons.

But more importantly, she can claim full responsibility, but someone is responsible for her and if she was incompetent; they are responsible for not fixing it before Americans died as a result of it.
 

·
Marine Organism
Joined
·
12,743 Posts
I say we all cash in our chips, pool our resoureces and buy a small catfish lake in Arkansas hills somewhere... :)

Lets all leave this RATRACE behind...

My workers in Guadalajara have 5x the quality of life I do making peanuts... It's already 100% shit there, so they dont worry about it... :D
Give me about 5 more years, and I may have enough to buy that 50' blow boat and just sail around the Caribbean! ;)

Should be a open and shut case. She already claimed full responsibility.
Should be. But the stupid liberals will probably nominate her for POTUS 2016!
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
Top