My guess is 70 mph and a 24" Bravo 1.
Stock 1996 Eliminator Daytona 22 Speed?
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
I'm running 78-82 GPS with a stock 502, Bravo 1 with a 28P.
Yep, setup on this boat would need changing. With a quick check using a tape measure to the floor I came up with the propshaft 5" below the pad. I'm sure if I leveled the boat and drive angle I'd have a much more accurate number. Even if I was off by 2 inches it would still be way to deep for a >80 mph boat. So big money for short drives and nosecones would be needed to get it inline or above the pad to maximize efficiency.
On my previous 21 whacker center pod cat going from 3" below to 1.25" above the pad was only worth 3 mph. That was as simple as a jackplate and a Titus Nosecone for a total bill of $750.00. I can't imagine what a short drive costs.
Looks like there's going to be some discussin with the wife about going back to OB's so we both can be happy.
Thanks to everyone for your input.
Ken
On my previous 21 whacker center pod cat going from 3" below to 1.25" above the pad was only worth 3 mph. That was as simple as a jackplate and a Titus Nosecone for a total bill of $750.00. I can't imagine what a short drive costs.
Looks like there's going to be some discussin with the wife
about going back to OB's so we both can be happy.Thanks to everyone for your input.
Ken
I own a 1992 22 daytona and you are dead on the x demension.i measured mine and it is 5.5.i f you want to go fast with little power go with the 22 daytona with the blackhawk bottom.they ran around 105 with like 600hp.Yep, setup on this boat would need changing. With a quick check using a tape measure to the floor I came up with the propshaft 5" below the pad. I'm sure if I leveled the boat and drive angle I'd have a much more accurate number. Even if I was off by 2 inches it would still be way to deep for a >80 mph boat. So big money for short drives and nosecones would be needed to get it inline or above the pad to maximize efficiency.
On my previous 21 whacker center pod cat going from 3" below to 1.25" above the pad was only worth 3 mph. That was as simple as a jackplate and a Titus Nosecone for a total bill of $750.00. I can't imagine what a short drive costs.
Looks like there's going to be some discussin with the wife
Thanks to everyone for your input.
Ken
When you raised the motor from 3in below to 1.5 above did you change the prop or keep the same one? You probably had a 300 with a low limiter so when you moved it up it put you on the limiter which is why you only gained 3mph.
Yep, setup on this boat would need
changing. With a quick check using a tape measure to the floor I came up with the propshaft 5" below the pad. I'm sure if I leveled the boat and drive angle I'd have a much more accurate number. Even if I was off by 2 inches it would still be way to deep for a >80 mph boat. So big money for short drives and nosecones would be needed to get it inline or above the pad to maximize efficiency.
On my previous 21 whacker center pod cat going from 3" below to 1.25" above the pad was only worth 3 mph. That was as simple as a jackplate and a Titus Nosecone for a total bill of $750.00. I can't imagine what a short drive costs.
Looks like there's going to be some discussin with the wife
Thanks to everyone for your input.
Ken
Blackhawk....
bulb
Rare, expensive, hard to find parts...I don't think that is a good way to go...just my opinion...
bulbHad a 95 22 daytona with stock 502 efi added m-1 procharger 5psi emi exh 30p prop fastest ever got it was 90mph with no ecm mods rev limit was 5000 elavation where i live is 4000ft hope this helps Almost forgot stock bavo 1
Almost forgot stock bavo 1Was that a hp500 engine or the standard 415hp 502 ?Had a 95 22 daytona with stock 502 efi added m-1 procharger 5psi emi exh 30p prop fastest ever got it was 90mph with no ecm mods rev limit was 5000 elavation where i live is 4000ft hope this helps
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
